ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Expert recommender systems in practice: evaluating semi-automatic profile generation
Full text PdfPdf (706 KB)
Source
Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Boston, MA, USA
SESSION: Expertise/people finding table of contents
Pages 59-68  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-246-7
Authors
Tim Reichling  University of Siegen, 57068 Siegen, Germany
Volker Wulf  University of Siegen and Fraunhofer FIT, 57068 Siegen, Germany
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 32,   Downloads (12 Months): 289,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1518701.1518712
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Expert recommender systems (ERS) are considered a promising technology in knowledge management. However, there are very few studies which evaluated their appropriation in practice. In this paper, we present results of a case study of expert recommender technology in a large European industrial association. Unlike existing expert recommender approaches, the system involves users in selecting textual documents for semi-automatic profile generation. Our study focuses on the appropriation of this functionality and discusses impacts from an organizational perspective.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Agostini, A., Albolino, S, De Paoli, F, Grasso, A. M,. Hinrichs, E. Supporting Communities by Providing Multiple Views, in: Proceedings of Communities and Technologies, Kluwer 2005, pp. 437--456
 
4
 
5
 
6
Cohen, D.; Prusak, L. In Good Company: How Social Capital makes Organizations Work, Harvard Business School Press, Boston 2001
 
7
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S., Furnas G., Landauer, T. and Harshman, R. Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, Vol. 41, No. 6, 1990, pp. 391--407
8
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
Huysman, M., Wulf, V. IT to Support Knowledge Sharing in Communities: Towards a Social Capital Analysis, in: Journal on Information Technology (JIT), No. 1, Vol. 21, (2006), pp. 40--51
13
 
14
Lindgren, R., Henfriedsson, O., Schultze, U. Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study. In: MIS Quaterly, Vol. 28, 2004, pp. 435--427
 
15
Maybury, M.; D'Amore, R.; House, D. Automated Discovery and Mapping of Expertise, in Ackerman, M.; Pipek, V.; Wulf, V. (eds): Expertise Sharing: Beyond Knowledge Management, MIT-Press, 2002, pp. 359--382
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
Polanyi, M. Implizites Wissen, 1. Auflage. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Taschenbuch Verlag, 1985
 
21
 
22
23
24
 
25
Streeter, L. A.; Lochbaum, K. A. An expert/expert location system based on an automatic representation of semantic structure, in Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications, San Diego, 1988, ACM-Press, New York, 1988, pp. 345--350
 
26
Susman, G., Evered, R. An assessment of the scientific merits of action research, Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 1978, pp. 582--603.
27
 
28
Wenger, E. Communities of Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge1998
29
30

Collaborative Colleagues:
Tim Reichling: colleagues
Volker Wulf: colleagues