A comparative study of speech and dialed input voice interfaces in rural India

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present a study comparing speech and dialed input voice user interfaces for farmers in Gujarat, India. We ran a controlled, between-subjects experiment with 45 participants. We found that the task completion rates were significantly higher with dialed input, particularly for subjects under age 30 and those with less than an eighth grade education. Additionally, participants using dialed input demonstrated a significantly greater performance improvement from the first to final task, and reported less difficulty providing input to the system.

REFERENCES

• 1: J. Cohen. Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1998.
• 2: C. Delogu, A. D. Carlo, P. Rotundi, and D. Sartori. A comparison between DTMF and ASR IVR services through objective and sujective evaluation. In IVTTA, 1998.
• 3: J. Foster, F. McInnes, M. Jack, S. Love, R. Dutton, and I. Nairn. An experimental evaluation of preference for data entry method in automated telephone services. In Behavior and Information Technology, 1998.
• 4: M. Goldstein, I. Bretan, E. L. Sallnas, and H. Bjork. Navigational abilities in voice-controlled dialogue structures. In Behavior and Information Technology, 1999.
• 5: Arun Kumar , Nitendra Rajput , Dipanjan Chakraborty , Sheetal K. Agarwal , Amit A. Nanavati, WWTW: the world wide telecom web, Proceedings of the 2007 workshop on Networked systems for developing regions, August 27-27, 2007, Kyoto, Japan [doi>10.1145/1326571.1326582]
• 6: K. M. Lee and J. Lai. Speech versus touch: A comparitive study of the use of speech and dtmf keypad for navigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2005.
• 7: T. J. Ndwe. personal communication, 2008.
• 8: Tapan Parikh , Kaushik Ghosh , Apala Chavan, Design studies for a financial management system for micro-credit groups in rural india, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Universal usability, November 10-11, 2003, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
• 9: M. Plauche. personal communication, 2008.
• 10: M. Plauche, U. Nallasamy, J. Pal, C. Wooters, and D. Ramachandran. Speech recognition for illiterate access to information and technology. In International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development, 2006.
• 11: J. Sherwani, N. Ali, S. Mirza, A. Fatma, Y. Memon, M. Karim, R. Tongia, and R. Rosenfeld. Healthline: Speech-based access to health information by low-literate users. In International Conference on Information and Communications Technologies and Development, 2007.
• 12: United Nations Development Program. Human development report, 2004.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Voice I/O

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
          Subjects: Human factors
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Evaluation/methodology

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
DTMF, ICTD, India, isolated word, rural development, semi-literate, speech interface, voice user interface