Correlating low-level image statistics with users - rapid aesthetic and affective judgments of web pages

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we report a study that examines the relationship between image-based computational analyses of web pages and users' aesthetic judgments about the same image material. Web pages were iteratively decomposed into quadrants of minimum entropy (quadtree decomposition) based on low-level image statistics, to permit a characterization of these pages in terms of their respective organizational symmetry, balance and equilibrium. These attributes were then evaluated for their correlation with human participants' subjective ratings of the same web pages on four aesthetic and affective dimensions. Several of these correlations were quite large and revealed interesting patterns in the relationship between low-level (i.e., pixel-level) image statistics and design-relevant dimensions.

REFERENCES

• 1: Arnheim, R. Art and visual perception. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA, 1954.
• 2: Birkhoff, G. D. Aesthetic measure. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1933.
• 3: Brainard, D. H. The Psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10, 4 (1997), 433--436
• 4: Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T. and Rensink, R. Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129, 4 (2000), 481--507.
• 5: Dondis, D. A. A primer of visual literacy. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1973.
• 6: Michèle Fabre-Thorpe , Arnaud Delorme , Catherine Marlot , Simon Thorpe, A Limit to the Speed of Processing in Ultra-Rapid Visual Categorization of Novel Natural Scenes, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, v.13 n.2, p.171-180, March 2001 [doi>10.1162/089892901564234]
• 7: Finkel, R. A. and Bentley, R. A. Quad trees: A data structure for retrieval on composite keys. Acta informatica 4, 1 (1974), 1--9.
• 8: Wilbert O. Galitz, The Essential Guide to User Interface Design: An Introduction to GUI Design Principles and Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 2007
• 9: Gladwell, M. Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking. Little, Brown and Company, New York, NY, USA, 2005.
• 10: Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M. and Koller, F. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualität {A questionnaire for the measurement of perceived hedonic and pragmatic attributes}. In Mensch&Computer 2003, B. G. Teubner (2003), 187--196.
• 11: Hubel, D. H. and Livingstone, M. S. Segregation of form, color, and stereopsis in primate area 18. Journal of Neuroscience 7, 11 (1987), 3378--3415.
• 12: Hubel, D. H. and Wiesel, T. N. Brain mechanisms of vision. Scientific American 241, 3 (1979), 150--162.
• 13: Koffka, K. Principles of Gestalt psychology. Lund Humphries, London, UK, 1935.
• 14: Kourtzi, Z. and Kanwisher, N. Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. The Journal of Neuroscience 20, 9 (2000), 3310--3318.
• 15: Masaaki Kurosu , Kaori Kashimura, Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability, Conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.292-293, May 07-11, 1995, Denver, Colorado, United States [doi>10.1145/223355.223680]
• 16: Lamme, V. A. F. and Roelfsema, P. R. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences 23, 11 (2000), 571--579.
• 17: Lindgaard, G., Fernandez, G., Dudek, C. and Brown, J. Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good impression. Behavior&Information Technology 25, 2 (2006), 115--126.
• 18: Thomas Leung , Jitendra Malik, Representing and Recognizing the Visual Appearance of Materials using Three-dimensional Textons, International Journal of Computer Vision, v.43 n.1, p.29-44, June 2001 [doi>10.1023/A:1011126920638]
• 19: Mathworks Image Processing Toolbox. www.mathworks.com - Image Processing Toolbox: Color: Reducing the Number of Colors in an Image
• 20: Ngo, D. C. L. Visit: Visitor information system implementation tool. Ph.D. Thesis, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland, 1994.
• 21: David Chek , Ling Ngo , John G. Byrne, Aesthetic Measures for Screen Design, Proceedings of the Australasian Conference on Computer Human Interaction, p.64, November 29-December 12, 1998
• 22: David Chek Ling Ngo , Lian Seng Teo , John G. Byrne, Modelling interface aesthetics, Information Sciences: an International Journal, v.152 n.1, p.25-46, June 2003 [doi>10.1016/S0020-0255(02)00404-8]
• 23: Norman, D. Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
• 24: Oliva, A and Torralba, A. Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research: Visual perception 155, (2006), 23--36.
• 25: Pelli, D. G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10, 4 (1997), 437--442.
• 26: Ruth Rosenholtz , Yuanzhen Li , Jonathan Mansfield , Zhenlan Jin, Feature congestion: a measure of display clutter, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055078]
• 27: Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell Systems Technical Journal 27 (1948), 379--423, 623--656.
• 28: Jenifer Tidwell, Designing Interfaces, O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2005
• 29: Noam Tractinsky, Aesthetics and apparent usability: empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.115-122, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258626]
• 30: Tractinsky, N., Katz, A. S. and Ikar, D. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting with Computers 13, 2 (2000), 127--145.
• 31: Treisman, A. M. and Gelade, G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12, 1 (1980), 97--136.
• 32: James Z. Wang , Jia Li , Gio Wiederhold, SIMPLIcity: Semantics-Sensitive Integrated Matching for Picture LIbraries, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, v.23 n.9, p.947-963, September 2001 [doi>10.1109/34.955109]
• 33: Zajonc, R. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no Inferences. American Psychologist 35, 2 (1980), 151 -- 175.
• 34: Zheng, X. S., Chakraborty, I., Lin, J. J. W. and Rauschenberger, R. Developing quantitative metrics to predict users' perceptions of interface design. In Proc. HFES, HFES (2008), in press.
• 35: Zipser, K., Lamme, V. A. F. and Schiller, P. H. Contextual modulation in primary visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 16, 22 (1996), 7376--7389.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Screen design (e.g., text, graphics, color)

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Measurement

Keywords:
aesthetic judgments, computer vision, empirical methods, image statistics, low-level features, user interface design