ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Think before you talk: an empirical study of relationship between speech pauses and cognitive load
Full text PdfPdf (240 KB)
Source
OZCHI; Vol. 287 archive
Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat table of contents
Cairns, Australia
SESSION: Speech & voice table of contents
Pages: 335-338  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:0-9803063-4-5
Authors
M. Asif Khawaja  NICTA/CSE UNSW, Sydney, Australia
Natalie Ruiz  NICTA/CSE UNSW, Sydney, Australia
Fang Chen  NICTA, Sydney, Australia
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 37,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1517744.1517814
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Measuring a user's level of cognitive load while they are interacting with the system could offer another dimension to the development of adaptable user interfaces. High levels of cognitive load affect performance and efficiency. However, current methods of measuring cognitive load are physically intrusive and interrupt the task flow. Certain speech features have been shown to change under high levels of load and are good candidates for cognitive load indices for usability evaluation and automatic adaptation of an interface or work environment. A speech-based dual-task user study is presented in which we explore the behaviour of speech pause features in natural speech. The experiment yielded new results confirming that speech pauses are useful indicators of high load versus low load speech. We report an increase in the percentage of time spent pausing from low load to high load tasks. We interpret these results within the framework of Baddeley's modal model of working memory and detail how such a measure could be utilized in the cognitive load measurement.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. "Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction." Cognition and Instruction, Vol 8, pp. 293--332.
 
3
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., and Gerven, P. W. M. V. "Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory." Educational Psychologist, 38, 1 (2003), 63--71.
 
4
 
5
 
6
Schilperoord J.; "On the Cognitive Status of Pauses in Discourse Production" In T. Olive & C. M. Levy (Eds.), Contemporary tools and techniques for studying writing, Vol. 10, pp. 61--88. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
 
7
 
8
Kramer, A. F., "Physiological metrics of mental workload: a review of recent progress," in Multiple-task performance, Damos, D. L., Ed. London: Taylor and Francis, 1991, pp. 279--328.
9
10
11
 
12
Kahneman, D., "Attention and effort", U.S.A: Prentice Hall, 1973.
 
13
Lennon C. and Burdick H.; "The Lexile Framework as an Approach for Reading Measurement and Success"; A white paper from The Lexile Framework for Reading, April 2004; http://www.Lexile.com; Last accessed: July 2008.
 
14
Dechert, Hans W. & Raupach, M.; "Towards a Cross-Linguistic Assessment of Speech Production." Frankfurt: Lang. 1980.
 
15
Schilperoord, J.; "It's about time: Temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production."; Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi, 1996.
 
16
Baddeley A., "Working Memory", Science, Vol. 255, pp. 556--559, 1992.

Collaborative Colleagues:
M. Asif Khawaja: colleagues
Natalie Ruiz: colleagues
Fang Chen: colleagues