ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Training and process change: a collaborative telehealth case study
Full text PdfPdf (2.77 MB)
Source
OZCHI; Vol. 287 archive
Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat table of contents
Cairns, Australia
SESSION: Collaboration, training & health table of contents
Pages 65-72  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:0-9803063-4-5
Author
Duncan Stevenson  Australian National University, Canberra
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 47,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1517744.1517765
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The next generation of telehealth systems running over broadband Internet will offer opportunities to change the way clinicians provide health services. This case study is a component of a larger research project which explores the implications of broadband telehealth in a tertiary healthcare setting. The research question of this case study addresses how to train and prepare clinicians to do their job using the next generation of telehealth systems. This case study presents observations of twelve clinicians during the training sessions conducted for them as they prepared to use a research prototype telehealth system in a pilot trial at their hospital.

The telehealth system was purpose-designed to address the range of needs of the clinicians involved and clinicians very rapidly understood the affordances of the system. Our observations show that the clinicians spent the bulk of the training sessions dealing with process change. They focused on three areas: collaborating with their remotely located clinical assistant, adapting their clinical practice in order to use the system and identifying areas where the telehealth system need to be changed to support their specific needs. Our observations also show that each of the senior surgeons amongst the clinicians (working in a different sub-specialty) dealt differently with the process changes.

We conclude that for complex tertiary healthcare telehealth applications the distinction between training given to the clinicians and process change identified by the clinicians is worth considering when preparing clinicians to use the next generation of telehealth systems. We suggest that teams developing advanced telehealth systems consider these issues of process change as they develop ways to prepare clinicians to use their system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
Corbin, J. and A. Strauss, Basics of Qualitative Research, 3rd Edition. 2008: Sage Publications.
 
4
Dobke, M., et al., Pilot Trial of Telemedicine as a Decision Aid for Patients with Chronic Wounds. Telemedicine and e-Health, 2008. 14(3): p. 245--249.
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
Griffiths, L., I. Blignault, and P. Yellowlees, Telemedicine as a means of delivering cognitive-behavioural therapy to rural and remote mental health clients. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2006. 12(3): p. 136--140.
 
9
Hansen, S., Useable and Used: A Case Study of the Role of the Social Sciences in the Development of an Emerging Technology for Healthcare, in School of Social Science and International Relations. 2007, University of New South Wales: Sydney.
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
Jan, R.-L., et al., An Internet-Based Interactive Telemonitoring System for Improving Childhood Asthma Outcomes in Taiwan. Telemedicine and e-Health, 2007. 13(3): p. 257--268.
 
14
Kratz, M., et al. NGI and Internet2: Accelerating the Creation of Tomorrow's Internet. in Tenth World Congress on Medical Informatics Medinfo 2001. 2001: IOS Press.
 
15
Li, J., et al., Development of a Broadband Telehealth System for Critical Care: Process and Lessons Learned. Telemedicine and e-Health, 2006. 12(5): p. 552--560.
16
 
17
Reason, P. and H. Bradbury, Handbook of Action Research. 2001: SAGE Publications.
 
18
 
19
 
20
Stringer, E., Action Research: Third Edition. 2007, Los Angeles: Sage Publications Inc.
 
21
Torppa, M., et al., Patient-nurse-doctor interaction in general practice teleconsultations - a qualitative analysis. J. Telemedicine and Telecare, 2006. 12(6): 306--310.