ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Taking shortcuts: embedded physical interfaces for spatial navigation
Full text PdfPdf (1.51 MB)
Source Tangible and embedded interaction archive
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction table of contents
Cambridge, United Kingdom
SESSION: Tangible and embedded interaction -- in the lab and in the wild table of contents
Pages 189-196  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-493-5
Authors
Douglas Boari  University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Mike Fraser  University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
Sponsors
: Microsoft Research (USA)
: Nokia (Finland)
: Microsoft Research Cambridge (UK)
: Microsoft Hardware (USA)
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 99,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1517664.1517706
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Designing for embodied physical interaction is just as important at a coarse level of spatial navigation as in the minutiae of object exploration. We created interactive embedded interfaces called 'Navitiles' that can be suspended in a floor to support navigation of a building. Our design uses capacitance and RFID sensors to determine users' location and LEDs to indicate possible directions. We determine whether Navitile cues could help users understand spatial relationships between points of interest. We based our study on a previous experiment that used a simulated VR maze to test whether users were able to exhibit 'shortcut' behaviour that would indicate the formation of spatial maps. Our hypothesis was that the physicality of embodied spatial navigation directed by the Navitiles in a real maze would enable users to achieve similar spatial shortcut behaviours to those found in the virtual task. We found significant evidence that sufficient spatial knowledge was acquired to enable successful shortcut performance between unexplored routes. However, further work is required to measure the effect of physical body movement on spatial skills development.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Cartwright, B. A. and Collett, T. S., Landmark learning in bees, in Journal of Comparative Physiology, vol. 151, pp. 521--543, 1983.
 
3
Chapuis, N., Durup, M. and Thinus-Blanc, C, The role of exploratory experience in a shortcut task by golden hamsters, in Animal Learning and Behaviour, vol. 15, pp. 174--178, 1987.
 
4
 
5
Foo, P., Warren, W. H., Duchon, A. P., and Tarr, M. J., Do humans integrate routes into a cognitive map? Map vs. landmark-based navigation of novel shortcuts, in Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Memory and Learning, vol. 31, pp. 195--215, 2005.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
 
14
Price, S., Rogers, Y., Scaife, M., Stanton, D. and Neale, H., Using 'tangibles' to promote novel forms of playful learning, in Interacting with Computers, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 169--185, 2003.
15
 
16
Stanton, D., Wilson, P., and Foreman, N., Human Shortcut Performance in a Computer-Simulated Maze: A comparative study, in Spatial Cognition and Computation, vols 3--4, pp. 315--329.
 
17
Tolman, E. C., Cognitive Maps in rats and men, in Psychological Review, vol. 55, no. 4, Jul 1948, pp. 189--208.
18
 
19
Wilson, P. N., Foreman, N. and Tlauka, M., Transfer of spatial information from a virtual to real environment, in Human Factors, vol. 39, pp. 526--531, 1997.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Douglas Boari: colleagues
Mike Fraser: colleagues