| Running up Blueberry Hill: prototyping whole body interaction in harmony space |
| Full text |
Pdf
(1.99 MB)
|
| Source
|
Tangible and embedded interaction
archive
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction
table of contents
Cambridge, United Kingdom
SESSION: New perspectives and theories on tangibility
table of contents
Pages 93-98
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-493-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
Simon Holland
|
The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
|
|
Paul Marshall
|
The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
|
|
Jon Bird
|
The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
|
|
Sheep Dalton
|
The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
|
|
Richard Morris
|
The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
|
|
Nadia Pantidi
|
The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
|
|
Yvonne Rogers
|
The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
|
|
Andy Clark
|
The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6, Downloads (12 Months): 65, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Musical harmony is considered to be one of the most abstract and technically difficult parts of music. It is generally taught formally via abstract, domain-specific concepts, principles, rules and heuristics. By contrast, when harmony is represented using an existing interactive desktop tool, Harmony Space, a new, parsimonious, but equivalently expressive, unified level of description emerges. This focuses not on abstract concepts, but on concrete locations, objects, areas and trajectories. This paper presents a design study of a prototype version of Harmony Space driven by whole body navigation, and characterizes the new opportunities presented for the principled manipulation of chord sequences and bass lines. These include: deeper engagement and directness; rich physical cues for memory and reflection, embodied engagement with rhythmic time constraints; hands which are free for other simultaneous activities (such as playing a traditional instrument); and qualitatively new possibilities for collaborative use.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Holland, S. (2000) Artificial Intelligence in Music Education: a critical review. In Miranda, E. (ed.) Readings in Music and Artificial Intelligence, Contemporary Music Studies Vol. 20. Pages 239--274.
|
| |
3
|
Balzano, G. J. The Group-theoretic Description of 12-fold and Microtonal Pitch systems. Computer Music Journal 4:4. Winter 1980.
|
| |
4
|
Longuet-Higgins, H. C. Letter to a Musical Friend. Music Review, August 1962 pp. 244--248.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Howard, P., Holland, S. and Whitelock, D. (1994) Keyboard Harmony: some applications of computers in music education. In Musical Times, Volume CXXXV No. 1817 pages 467--471.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Rick, J. and Rogers, Y. (2008) From DigiQuilt to DigiTile: Adapting Educational Technology to a Multi-Touch Table. In Proceedings of Tabletop, 2008.
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Holland, S. (2007) Open Source Squeak implementation of Tuio. http://mcs.open.ac.uk/sh2/squeakmusic.html
|
| |
11
|
Sheridan, J. G., Bryan-Kinns, N. and Bayliss, A. Encouraging Witting Participation and Performance in Digital Live Art. In Proceedings of HCI'07, pp. 13--23.
|
|