ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis of single and networked auctions
Full text PdfPdf (257 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) archive
Volume 9 ,  Issue 2  (May 2009) table of contents
Article No. 8  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1533-5399
Author
Erol Gelenbe  Imperial College London, UK
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 13,   Downloads (12 Months): 176,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1516539.1516543
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Web-based computerized auctions are increasingly present in the Internet. We can imagine that in the future this trend will actually be extended to situations where virtual buyer and seller agents will conduct automated transactions across the network, and that large sectors of the economy may be strucured in this manner. The purpose of this article is to model automated bidders and sellers which interact through a network. We model the bidding process as a random arrival process while the price attained by a good is modeled as a discrete random variable. We obtain analytical solutions allowing us to compute the income from a single auction, or the income per unit time from a repeated sequence of auctions. A variety of single-auction models are studied, including English and Vickrey auctions, and the income per unit time is derived as a function of other parameters, including the rate of arrival of bids, the seller's decision time, the value of the good, and the “rest time” of the seller between successive auctions. We illustrate the results via numerical examples. We also introduce a model for networked auctions where bidders can circulate among a set of interconnected auctions which we call the Mobile Bidder Model (MBM). We obtain an analytical solution for the MBM under the assumption,which we call the “active bidders assumption,” that activities that are internal to an auction (bids and sales) are much more frequent than changes that occur in the number of bidders at each auction.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Chow, Y. S., Moriguti, S., Robbins, H., and Samuels, S. M. 1964. Optimal selection based on relative rank (the secretary problem). Israel J. Math. 2, 81--90.
 
2
3
 
4
Finch, S. R. 2003. Optimal stopping constants. In Mathematical Constants, 361--363.
 
5
Gelenbe, E. 2003. Sensible decisions based on qos. Comput. Managem. Sci. 1, 1, 1--14.
6
7
 
8
McAfee, R. P. and McMillan, J. 1987. Auctions and bidding. J. Econom. Literature 25, 699--738.
 
9
Medhi, J. 1994. Stochastic Processes, 2nd ed. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi.
 
10
Milgrom, P. R. and Weber, R. 1982. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50, 1089--1122.
 
11
Shehory, O. 2009. Optimality and risk in purchase from multiple auctions. Lecture Volumes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2182. Springer, 142--153.
 
12
Shehory, O. 2002. Optimal bidding in multiple concurrent auctions. Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst. 11, 3-4, 315--327.