ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
GCIP: exploiting the generation and optimization of integration processes
Full text PdfPdf (655 KB)
Source Extending Database Technology; Vol. 360 archive
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology table of contents
Saint Petersburg, Russia
DEMONSTRATION SESSION: Demonstrations: Demo group 1 table of contents
Pages 1128-1131  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-422-5
Authors
Matthias Boehm  Dresden University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Germany
Uwe Wloka  Dresden University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Germany
Dirk Habich  Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
Wolfgang Lehner  Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 34,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1516360.1516494
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As a result of the changing scope of data management towards the management of highly distributed systems and applications, integration processes have gained in importance. Such integration processes represent an abstraction of workflow-based integration tasks. In practice, integration processes are pervasive and the performance of complete IT infrastructures strongly depends on the performance of the central integration platform that executes the specified integration processes. In this area, the three major problems are: (1) significant development efforts, (2) low portability, and (3) inefficient execution. To overcome those problems, we follow a model-driven generation approach for integration processes. In this demo proposal, we want to introduce the so-called GCIP Framework (Generation of Complex Integration Processes) which allows the modeling of integration process and the generation of different concrete integration tasks. The model-driven approach opens opportunities for rule-based and workload-based optimization techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Albrecht and F. Naumann. Managing etl processes. In Workshop New Trends in Information Integration (NTII), 2008.
 
2
M. Böhm, D. Habich, W. Lehner, and U. Wloka. Dipbench: An independent benchmark for data intensive integration processes. In IIMAS, 2008.
 
3
M. Böhm, D. Habich, W. Lehner, and U. Wloka. Dipbench toolsuite: A framework for benchmarking integration systems. In ICDE, 2008.
 
4
M. Böhm, D. Habich, W. Lehner, and U. Wloka. Model-driven generation and optimization of complex integration processes. In ICEIS, 2008.
 
5
M. Böhm, D. Habich, U. Wloka, J. Bittner, and W. Lehner. Towards self-optimization of message transformation processes. In ADBIS, 2007.
 
6
S. Dessloch, M. A. Hernandez, R. Wisnesky, A. Radwan, and J. Zhou. Orchid: Integrating schema mapping and etl. In ICDE, 2008.
7
 
8
H. Li and D. Zhan. Workflow timed critical path optimization. Nature and Science, 3(2), 2005.
 
9
 
10
 
11
Collaborative Colleagues:
Matthias Boehm: colleagues
Uwe Wloka: colleagues
Dirk Habich: colleagues
Wolfgang Lehner: colleagues