| GCIP: exploiting the generation and optimization of integration processes |
| Full text |
Pdf
(655 KB)
|
| Source
|
Extending Database Technology; Vol. 360
archive
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology
table of contents
Saint Petersburg, Russia
DEMONSTRATION SESSION: Demonstrations: Demo group 1
table of contents
Pages 1128-1131
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-422-5
|
|
Authors
|
|
Matthias Boehm
|
Dresden University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Germany
|
|
Uwe Wloka
|
Dresden University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Germany
|
|
Dirk Habich
|
Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
|
|
Wolfgang Lehner
|
Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
|
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 32, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
As a result of the changing scope of data management towards the management of highly distributed systems and applications, integration processes have gained in importance. Such integration processes represent an abstraction of workflow-based integration tasks. In practice, integration processes are pervasive and the performance of complete IT infrastructures strongly depends on the performance of the central integration platform that executes the specified integration processes. In this area, the three major problems are: (1) significant development efforts, (2) low portability, and (3) inefficient execution. To overcome those problems, we follow a model-driven generation approach for integration processes. In this demo proposal, we want to introduce the so-called GCIP Framework (Generation of Complex Integration Processes) which allows the modeling of integration process and the generation of different concrete integration tasks. The model-driven approach opens opportunities for rule-based and workload-based optimization techniques.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
A. Albrecht and F. Naumann. Managing etl processes. In Workshop New Trends in Information Integration (NTII), 2008.
|
| |
2
|
M. Böhm, D. Habich, W. Lehner, and U. Wloka. Dipbench: An independent benchmark for data intensive integration processes. In IIMAS, 2008.
|
| |
3
|
M. Böhm, D. Habich, W. Lehner, and U. Wloka. Dipbench toolsuite: A framework for benchmarking integration systems. In ICDE, 2008.
|
| |
4
|
M. Böhm, D. Habich, W. Lehner, and U. Wloka. Model-driven generation and optimization of complex integration processes. In ICEIS, 2008.
|
| |
5
|
M. Böhm, D. Habich, U. Wloka, J. Bittner, and W. Lehner. Towards self-optimization of message transformation processes. In ADBIS, 2007.
|
| |
6
|
S. Dessloch, M. A. Hernandez, R. Wisnesky, A. Radwan, and J. Zhou. Orchid: Integrating schema mapping and etl. In ICDE, 2008.
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
H. Li and D. Zhan. Workflow timed critical path optimization. Nature and Science, 3(2), 2005.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Marko Vrhovnik , Holger Schwarz , Oliver Suhre , Bernhard Mitschang , Volker Markl , Albert Maier , Tobias Kraft, An approach to optimize data processing in business processes, Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on Very large data bases, September 23-27, 2007, Vienna, Austria
|
|