ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Supporting annotations on relations
Full text PdfPdf (682 KB)
Source Extending Database Technology; Vol. 360 archive
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Extending Database Technology: Advances in Database Technology table of contents
Saint Petersburg, Russia
SESSION: Research sessions: Database summarization table of contents
Pages 379-390  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-422-5
Authors
Mohamed Y. Eltabakh  Purdue University
Walid G. Aref  Purdue University
Ahmed K. Elmagarmid  Purdue University
Mourad Ouzzani  Purdue University
Yasin N. Silva  Purdue University
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 58,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1516360.1516405
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Annotations play a key role in understanding and curating databases. Annotations may represent comments, descriptions, lineage information, among several others. Annotation management is a vital mechanism for sharing knowledge and building an interactive and collaborative environment among database users and scientists. What makes it challenging is that annotations can be attached to database entities at various granularities, e.g., at the table, tuple, column, cell levels, or more generally, to any subset of cells that results from a select statement. Therefore, simple comment fields in tuples would not work because of the combinatorial nature of the annotations. In this paper, we present extensions to current database management systems to support annotations. We propose storage schemes to efficiently store annotations at multiple granularities, i.e., at the table, tuple, column, and cell levels. Compared to storing the annotations with the individual cells, the proposed schemes achieve more than an order-of-magnitude reduction in storage and up to 70% saving in the query execution time. We define types of annotations that inherit different behaviors. Through these types, users can specify, for example, whether or not an annotation is continuously applied over newly inserted data and whether or not an annotation is archived when the base data is modified. These annotation types raise several storage and processing challenges that are addressed in the paper. We propose declarative ways to add, archive, query, and propagate annotations. The proposed mechanisms are realized through extensions to the standard SQL. We implemented the proposed functionalities inside PostgreSQL with an easy to use Excel-based front-end graphical interface.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Oracle life sciences platform, www.oracle.com/.technology/industries/life_sciences/index.html.
 
2
 
3
D. Bhagwat, L. Chiticariu, W. Tan, and G. Vijayvargiya. An annotation management system for relational databases. VLDB Journal, 14(5), 2005.
4
5
6
 
7
M. Eltabakh, M. Ouzzani, and W. Aref. bdbms: A database management system for biological data. In CIDR, pages 196--206, 2007.
 
8
M. Eltabakh, M. Ouzzani, W. Aref, A. Elmagarmid, Y. Laura-Silva, M. Arshad, D. Salt, and I. Baxter. Managing biological data using bdbms. In ICDE, pages 1600--1603, 2008.
 
9
F. Geerts and J. V. D. Bussche. Relational completeness of query languages for annotated databases. DBPL, 4797:127--137, 2007.
 
10
11
 
12
13
14
 
15
W. C. Tan. Containment of relational queries with annotation propagation. In DBPL, 2003.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mohamed Y. Eltabakh: colleagues
Walid G. Aref: colleagues
Ahmed K. Elmagarmid: colleagues
Mourad Ouzzani: colleagues
Yasin N. Silva: colleagues