|
ABSTRACT
In delay (or disruption) tolerant networks(DTNs), the physical network is partitioned and the topology changes by node contacts. In most cases, there are no globally synchronized topology information available, which makes routing in DTNs challenging. To enable message routing without topology, we take potential-based routing(PBR) approach. We define potential-based message forwarding (PBMF) model and potential field construction method, which can be implemented in autonomously and distributed manner. We also discuss message overflow phenomenon, which should be considered in the deployment phase. This work assumes forwarding-based message delivery because of its lightweightness in delivery management. We developed a prototype system and evaluated (1) the behavior of potential-field and message delivery and (2) the model of message overflow. We also carried out a 100-node scale simulation and found that compared to epidemic routing, (3) about 50% of delivery was performed within three times of the best delivery latency and (4) the usage of message storage was reduced to 1%.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Anindya Basu , Alvin Lin , Sharad Ramanathan, Routing using potentials: a dynamic traffic-aware routing algorithm, Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 25-29, 2003, Karlsruhe, Germany
[doi> 10.1145/863955.863962]
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
X. Chen and A. L. Murphy. Enabling disconnected transitive communication in mobile ad hoc networks. In ACM POMC, 2001.
|
 |
5
|
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Y. Ganjali and N. McKeown. Routing in a highly dynamic topology. In IEEE SECON, pages 164--175, 2005.
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
Sushant Jain , Kevin Fall , Rabin Patra, Routing in a delay tolerant network, Proceedings of the 2004 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications, August 30-September 03, 2004, Portland, Oregon, USA
|
| |
10
|
V. Lenders, M. May, and B. Plattner. Density-based vs. proximity-based anycast routing for mobile networks. In IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1--13, 2006.
|
| |
11
|
A. Lindgren, A. Doria, and O. Schelen. Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3126:239--254, sep 2004.
|
| |
12
|
H. Liu, Z.-L. Zhang, J. Srivastava, and V. Firoiu. PWave: A multi-source multi-sink anycast routing framework for wireless sensor networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4479:179--190, nov 2007.
|
| |
13
|
G. Malkin. RFC2453: Rip version 2, 1998.
|
| |
14
|
J. Moy. RFC2328: Ospf version 2, 1998.
|
 |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
C. Perkins, E. Belding-Royer, and S. Das. RFC1058: Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (aodv) routing, 2003.
|
| |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
Thrasyvoulos Spyropoulos , Konstantinos Psounis , Cauligi S. Raghavendra, Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks, Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Delay-tolerant networking, p.252-259, August 26-26, 2005, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1080139.1080143]
|
| |
19
|
T. Spyropoulos, T. Turletti, and K. Obraczka. Utility-based message replication for intermittently connected heterogeneous networks. In IEEE WoWMoM, 2007.
|
| |
20
|
A. Vahdat and D. Becker. Epidemic routing for partially-connected ad hoc networks. Technical report, Duke University, 2000.
|
|