ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Datalog±: a unified approach to ontologies and integrity constraints
Full text PdfPdf (763 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 361 archive
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Database Theory table of contents
St. Petersburg, Russia
SESSION: Invited papers table of contents
Pages 14-30  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-423-2
Authors
Andrea Calì  University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Georg Gottlob  University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Thomas Lukasiewicz  University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 30,   Downloads (12 Months): 183,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1514894.1514897
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We report on a recently introduced family of expressive extensions of Datalog, called Datalog±, which is a new framework for representing ontological axioms in form of integrity constraints, and for query answering under such constraints. Datalog± is derived from Datalog by allowing existentially quantified variables in rule heads, and by enforcing suitable properties in rule bodies, to ensure decidable and efficient query answering. We first present different languages in the Datalog± family, providing tight complexity bounds for all cases but one (where we have a low complexity AC0 upper bound). We then show that such languages are general enough to capture the most common tractable ontology languages. In particular, we show that the DL-Lite family of description logics and F-Logic Lite are expressible in Datalog±. We finally show how stratified negation can be added to Datalog± while keeping ontology querying tractable in the data complexity. Datalog± is a natural and very general framework that can be successfully employed in different contexts such as data integration and exchange. This survey mainly summarizes two recent papers.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
H. Andréka, I. Németi, and J. van Benthem. Modal languages and bounded fragments of predicate logic. J. Philos. Logic, 27(3):217--274, 1998.
 
3
4
 
5
6
 
7
T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284:34--43, 2001.
 
8
D. Brickley and R. V. Guha. RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF Schema, 2004. W3C Recommendation.
 
9
A. Calì, G. Gottlob, and M. Kifer. Taming the infinite chase: Query answering under expressive relational constraints. Unpublished technical report, 2008. Available from the authors or at http://benner.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/staff/gottlob/CGK.pdf. This is the full and revised version of a preliminary short version which has appeared in Proc. of KR 2008, pages 70--80. AAAI Press, 2008.
 
10
A. Calì, G. Gottlob, and T. Lukasiewicz. A general Datalog-based framework for tractable query answering over ontologies, 2008. Manuscript, available from the authors.
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
M. A. Casanova, R. Fagin, and C. H. Papadimitriou. Inclusion dependencies and their interaction with functional dependencies. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 28:29--59, 1984.
 
15
16
17
 
18
A. K. Chandra and M. Y. Vardi. The implication problem for functional and inclusion dependencies is undecidable. SIAM J. Comput., 14:671--677, 1985.
 
19
 
20
J. de Bruijn and S. Heymans. Logical foundations of (e)RDF(S): Complexity and reasoning. In Proc. of ISWC 2007, volume 4825 of LNCS, pages 86--99. Springer, 2007.
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
M. E. Goncalves and E. Grädel. Decidability issues for action guarded logics. In Proc. of DL 2000, pages 123--132, 2000.
25
 
26
 
27
E. Grädel. On the restraining power of guards. J. Symb. Log., 64(4):1719--1742, 1999.
 
28
U. Hustadt, B. Motik, and U. Sattler. Data complexity of reasoning in very expressive description logics. In Proc. of IJCAI 2005, pages 466--471, 2005.
 
29
D. S. Johnson and A. C. Klug. Testing containment of conjunctive queries under functional and inclusion dependencies. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 28(1):167--189, 1984.
30
31
32
 
33
34
 
35
A. Poggi, D. Lembo, D. Calvanese, G. De Giacomo, M. Lenzerini, and R. Rosati. Linking data to ontologies. J. Data Semantics, 10:133--173, 2008.
 
36
 
37
 
38
M. Y. Vardi, 1984. Personal communication reported in {29}.
39

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrea Calì: colleagues
Georg Gottlob: colleagues
Thomas Lukasiewicz: colleagues