ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
The case for intentional networking
Full text PdfPdf (179 KB)
Source Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications archive
Proceedings of the 10th workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications table of contents
Santa Cruz, California
Article No.: 9  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-283-2
Authors
Jason Flinn  University of Michigan
T. J. Giuli  Ford Motor Company
Brett Higgins  University of Michigan
Brian Noble  University of Michigan
Azarias Reda  University of Michigan
David Watson  Ford Motor Company
Sponsor
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 131,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1514411.1514418
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Wireless infrastructures are increasingly diverse, complex, and difficult to manage. Those who restrict themselves to homogeneous, managed campus or corporate networks are a vanishing breed. In the wild, users are confronted with many overlapping infrastructures with a broad variety of strengths and weaknesses. Such diversity of infrastructure is both a challenge and an opportunity. The challenge lies in presenting the alternatives to applications and users in a way that provides the best possible utility to both. However, by managing these many alternatives, we can provide significant benefits, exploiting multiple networks concurrently and planning future transmissions intelligently.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Bay area wireless users group. http://bawug.org/.
3
4
 
5
R. Chandra, P. Bahl, and P. Bahl. MultiNet: Connecting to multiple IEEE 802.11 networks using a single wireless card. In Proceedings of INFOCOM, pages 882--893, March 2004.
 
6
General Electric Co. Ge healthcare and sprint deliver enhanced connectivity to hospitals across north america. Press Release, August 2007.
 
7
8
 
9
10
11
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
P. Johansson, R. Kapoor, M. Kazantzidis, and M. Gerla. Personal area networks: Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11? International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 9(2):89--103, April 2002.
 
16
C. Kalmanek, J. Murray, C. Rice, B Gessel, R. Kabre, and A. Moskal. A network-based architecture for seamless mobility services. IEEE Communications Magazine, 44(6):103--109, June 2006.
 
17
 
18
R. H. Katz and E. A. Brewer. The Case for Wireless Overlay Networks. In SPIE Multimedia and Networking Conference, January 1996.
19
 
20
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
J. Newsome and D. Song. Dynamic taint analysis: Automatic detection, analysis, and signature generation of exploit attacks on commodity software. In Proceedings of the 12th Network and Distributed Systems Security Symposium, San Diego, CA, February 2005.
25
 
26
27
 
28
NYCWireless. http://nycwireless.net/.
 
29
 
30
31
 
32
M. Satyanarayanan. Pervasive Computing: Vision and Challenges. IEEE Personal Communications, 8(4):10--17, August 2001.
 
33
SeattleWireless. http://seattlewireless.net/.
 
34
 
35
36
37
38
Collaborative Colleagues:
Jason Flinn: colleagues
T. J. Giuli: colleagues
Brett Higgins: colleagues
Brian Noble: colleagues
Azarias Reda: colleagues
David Watson: colleagues