ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
A grammatical evolution approach to intrusion detection on mobile ad hoc networks
Full text PdfPdf (490 KB)
Source
Conference On Wireless Network Security archive
Proceedings of the second ACM conference on Wireless network security table of contents
Zurich, Switzerland
SESSION: Ad hoc networks table of contents
Pages: 95-102  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-460-7
Authors
Sevil Şen  University of York, York, United Kingdom
John Andrew Clark  University of York, York, United Kingdom
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 36,   Downloads (12 Months): 351,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1514274.1514289
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In recent years mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) have become a very popular research topic. By providing communication in the absence of a fixed infrastructure they are very attractive for many applications such as tactical and disaster recovery operations and virtual conferences. On the other hand, this flexibility introduces new security risks. Moreover, different characteristics of MANETs make conventional security systems ineffective and inefficient for this new environment. Intrusion detection, which is an indispensable part of a security system, presents also a particular challenge due to the dynamic nature of MANETs, the lack of central points, and their highly constrained nodes. In this paper, we propose to investigate the use of an artificial intelligence based learning technique to explore this difficult design space. The grammatical evolution technique inspired by natural evolution is explored to detect known attacks on MANETs such as DoS attacks and route disruption attacks. Intrusion detection programs are evolved for each attack and distributed to each node on the network. The performance of these programs is evaluated on different types of networks with different mobility and traffic patterns to show their effects on intrusion detection ability.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bonnmotion: A mobility scenario generation and analysis tool.
 
2
libge: A c++ library for grammatical evolution.
 
3
Ns-2: The network simulator.
 
4
A. Abraham and C. Grosan. Evolving intrusion detection systems. In Genetic Systems Programming: Theory and Experiences, volume 13, pages 57--79. Springer, 2006.
 
5
A. Abraham, C. Grosan, and C. Martiv-Vide. Evolutionary design of intrusion detection programs. Int. Journal of Network Security, 4:328--339, 2007.
 
6
F. Anjum and R. Talpade. Lipad: lightweight packet drop detection for ad hoc networks. In 60th IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference Proceedings, pages 1233--1237. IEEE, 2004.
 
7
S. Buchegger and J.-Y. L. Boudec. Nodes bearing grudges: Towards routing security, fairness, and robustness in mobile ad hoc networks. In 10th Euromicro Workshop on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing Proceedings, pages 403--410. IEEE Computer Society, January 2002.
 
8
T. Camp, J. Boleng, and V. Davies. A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (WCMC): Special issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Research, Trends and Applications, 2:483--502, 2002.
 
9
 
10
M. Crosbie and G. Stafford. Applying genetic programming to intrusion detection. In AAAI Symposium on Genetic Programming Proceedings, 1995.
 
11
R. Guha, O. Kachirski, D. Schwartz, S. Stoecklin, and E. Yilmaz. Case-based agents for packet-level intrusion detection in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Computer and Information Sciences, 2002.
12
 
13
J. P. A. J. J. Parker, J. Undercoffer. On intrusion detection and response for mobile ad hoc networks. In 23th IEEE Int. Performance Computing and Communications Conference Proceedings, 2004.
 
14
 
15
Y. Lu, Y. Zhong, and B. Bhargava. Packet loss in mobile ad hoc networks. TR 03-009, Dept. of Computer Science, Purdue University, April.
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
A. Smith. An examination of an intrusion detection architecture for wireless ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of the 5th National Colloquium for Information System Security Education, 2001.
 
22
B. Sun, K. Wu, and U. Pooch. Zone-based intrusion detection for mobile ad hoc networks. Int. Journal of Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks, 2(3), 2003.
 
23
C. Tseng, S.-H. Wang, W. Lee, C. Ko, and K. Lewitt. Demem: Distributed evidence driven message exchange intrusion detection model for manet. In In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Recent Advances in Intrusion Detection (RAID'06), pages 249--271. Springer, 2006.
24
 
25
 
26
D. Wilson and D. Kaur. Knowledge extraction from kdd'99 intrusion data using grammatical evolution. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 4:237--244, February 2007.
 
27
C. Yin, S. Tian, H. Huang, and J. He. Applying genetic programming to evolve learned rules for network anomaly detection. In ICNC Proceedings, LNCS 3612, pages 323--331. Springer, 2005.
 
28

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sevil Şen: colleagues
John Andrew Clark: colleagues