ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Responsiveness to robots: effects of ingroup orientation & communication style on hri in china
Full text PdfPdf (425 KB)
Source
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction table of contents
La Jolla, California, USA
SESSION: HRI late-breaking abstracts table of contents
Pages 247-248  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-404-1
Authors
Lin Wang  Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Pei-Luen Patrick Rau  Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Vanessa Evers  University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Benjamin Robinson  Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Pamela Hinds  Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1514095.1514159
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the effects of group orientation and communication style on Chinese subjects' responsiveness to robots. A 2x2 experiment was conducted with group orientation (ingroup vs. outgroup) and communication style (implicit vs. explicit) as dimensions. The results confirm expectations that subjects with a Chinese cultural background are more responsive to robots that use implicit communication styles. We also found some evidence that subjects were more responsive when they thought of the robot as an ingroup member. These findings inform the design of robots for use in China and countries with similar cultural values and reinforce the importance of culturally sensitive design in HRI.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Brewer, M. and Chen, Y. R. 2007. Where (Who) Are Collectives in Collectivism? Toward Conceptual Clarification of Individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review. 114, 1, 133--151.
 
2
Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Toomey, S., Nishida T., Kim, K. and Heyman, S. 1996. The Influence of Cultural Individualism-Collectivism, Self Construals, and Individual Values on Communication Styles Across Cultures. Human Communication Research. 22, 4, 510--543.
 
3
Hall, E. T. 1989. Beyond culture. New York, Anchor Press.
 
4
 
5
Markus, H. R. and Kitayama, S. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review. 98, 2, 224--253.
6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Lin Wang: colleagues
Pei-Luen Patrick Rau: colleagues
Vanessa Evers: colleagues
Benjamin Robinson: colleagues
Pamela Hinds: colleagues