Making sense of agentic objects and teleoperation: in-the-moment and reflective perspectives

ABSTRACT

Agentic objects are those entities that are perceived and responded to in-the-moment as if they were agentic despite the likely reflective perception that they are not agentic at all. They include autonomous robots, but also simpler systems like automatic doors, trashcans, and staplers--anything that seems to possess agency. It is well known that low-level spatiotemporal information elicits in-the-moment responses that are interpreted as perceiving mentalism [8, 17], but people reflectively believe that there is a distinction between human and non-human agents. How are we to make sense of these agentic objects?

REFERENCES

• 1: Bateson, G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 2000, 465.
• 2: Chorost, M. Rebuilt: My Journey Back to the Hearing World. Mariner, Boston, MA, USA, 2006, 42.
• 3: Clark, H. H. Using Language. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1996.
• 4: Deledalle, G. Charles S. Peirce's philosophy of signs. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, USA, 2000.
• 5: Harris, P.L. The Work of the Imagination. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, UK, 2000.
• 6: Heer, J. and Khooshabeh, P. Seeing the invisible. Workshop at AVI (2004).
• 7: Heidegger, M. Basic Writings. Harper & Row, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1962.
• 8: Heider, F. and Simmel, M. An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 2 (1944), 243--259.
• 9: Johnson, J. (Latour, B.) Mixing humans and nonhumans together. Social Problems 35, 3 (1988), 225--258.
• 10: Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. Judgment under uncertainty. Science 185, 4157 (1974), 1124--1131.
• 11: Leder, D. The Absent Body. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1990, 34.
• 12: Mead, G.H. Mind, Self, and Society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA, 1934.
• 13: Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of Perception. Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2005, 152.
• 14: Nass, C. and Moon, Y. Machines and mindlessness. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (1), 2000, 81--103.
• 15: Clifford Nass , Jonathan Steuer , Ellen Tauber , Heidi Reeder, Anthropomorphism, agency, and ethopoeia: computers as social actors, INTERACT '93 and CHI '93 conference companion on Human factors in computing systems, p.111-112, April 24-29, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/259964.260137]
• 16: Reeves, B. and Nass, C. The Media Equation. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA, 1996.
• 17: Scholl, B.J. and Tremoulet, P.D. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cog Sci 4, 8 (2000), 299--309.
• 18: Turing, A. Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59, (1950), 433--460.
• 19: Walton, K.L. Mimesis as Make-believe. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990.
• 20: Wiener, N. The Human Use of Human Beings. Da Capo Press, New York, NY, USA, 1988.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Theory and methods

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Theory

Keywords:
agentic object, human-robot interaction, in-the-moment, perceived agency, teleoperation