ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
How people talk when teaching a robot
Full text PdfPdf (606 KB)
Source
ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction table of contents
La Jolla, California, USA
SESSION: Designing robots based on human behavior table of contents
Pages 23-30  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-404-1
Authors
Elizabeth S. Kim  Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Dan Leyzberg  Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Katherine M. Tsui  Univ. of Massachusetts, Lowell, Lowell, MA, USA
Brian Scassellati  Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 128,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1514095.1514102
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We examine affective vocalizations provided by human teachers to robotic learners. In unscripted one-on-one interactions, participants provided vocal input to a robotic dinosaur as the robot selected toy buildings to knock down. We find that (1) people vary their vocal input depending on the learner's performance history, (2) people do not wait until a robotic learner completes an action before they provide input and (3) people naively and spontaneously use intensely affective prosody. Our findings suggest modifications may be needed to traditional machine learning models to better fit observed human tendencies. Our observations of human behavior contradict the popular assumptions made by machine learning algorithms (in particular, reinforcement learning) that the reward function is stationary and path-independent for social learning interactions.

We also propose an interaction taxonomy that describes three phases of a human-teacher's vocalizations: direction, spoken before an action is taken; guidance, spoken as the learner communicates an intended action; and feedback, spoken in response to a completed action.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Ang, R. Dhillon, A. Krupski, E. Shriberg, and A. Stolcke. Prosody-Based Automatic Detection of Annoyance and Frustration in Human-Computer Dialog. In International Conference Spoken Language Process. (ICSLP), volume 3, 2002.
 
2
C. Bartelmus. LIRC - Linux Infrared Remote Control. In http://www.lirc.org/, September 2008.
3
 
4
 
5
J. Broekens. Emotion and Reinforcement: Affective Facial Expressions Facilitate Robot Learning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Artificial Intelligence for Human Computing, 4451:113--132, 2007.
6
 
7
M. M. Chouinard and E. V. Clark. Adult Reformulations of Child Errors as Negative Evidence. Journal of Child Language, 30(03):637--669, 2003.
 
8
J. Cohen. Weighted Kappa: Nominal Scale Agreement with Provision for Scaled Disagreement or Partial Credit. Psychological Bulletin, 70(4):213--220, 1968.
9
 
10
DogsBody & Ratchet Software. MySkit - Performance Editor for PLEO. In http://www.dogsbodynet.com/myskit/index.html, January 2009.
 
11
 
12
IguanaWorks. IguanaWorks. In http://iguanaworks.net/, September 2008.
13
 
14
L. Kaelbling, M. Littman, and A. Moore. Reinforcement Learning: A Survey. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 4(2):237--285, 1996.
 
15
F. Kaplan, P.-Y. Oudeyer, E. Kubinyi, and A. Miklósi. Robotic Clicker Training. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 38(3-4):197--206, 2002.
16
 
17
E. S. Kim and B. Scassellati. Learning to Refine Behavior Using Prosodic Feedback. In Proceedings International Conference Development and Learning (ICDL), 2007.
 
18
C. M. Lee and S. Narayanan. Toward Detecting Emotions in Spoken Dialogs. IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, 13(2):293--303, March 2005.
 
19
D. J. Litman and K. Forbes-Riley. Recognizing Student Emotions and Attitudes on the Basis of Utterances in Spoken Tutoring Dialogues with Both Human and Computer Tutors. Speech Communication, 48(5):559--590, Feb 2006.
20
 
21
M. Nicolescu and M. Matarić. Learning and Interacting in Human-Robot Domains. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 31(5):419--430, 2001.
 
22
C. Osgood, G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum. The Measurement of Meaning. Univ. of Illinois Press, 1957.
 
23
A. Robinson-Mosher and B. Scassellati. Prosody Recognition in Male Infant-Directed Speech. In Proceedings the IEEE/RSJ International Conference Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2004.
 
24
 
25
L. Steels and F. Kaplan. AIBOÜOs First Words: The Social Learning of Language and Meaning. Evolution of Communication, 4(1):3--32, 2001.
26
 
27
 
28
A. L. Thomaz and C. Breazeal. Reinforcement Learning with Human Teachers: Evidence of Feedback and Guidance with Implications for Learning Performance. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), 2006.
 
29
A. L. Thomaz and C. Breazeal. Transparency and Socially Guided Machine Learning. In Proceedings International Conference Development and Learning (ICDL), 2006.
 
30
UGOBE. PleoWorld - The Home of Pleo, the Robotic Baby Dinosaur from UGOBE Life Forms. In http://www.pleoworld.com, September 2008.
31

Collaborative Colleagues:
Elizabeth S. Kim: colleagues
Dan Leyzberg: colleagues
Katherine M. Tsui: colleagues
Brian Scassellati: colleagues