ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Throughput-optimal configuration of fixed wireless networks
Full text PdfPdf (971 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON) archive
Volume 16 ,  Issue 5  (October 2008) table of contents
Pages 1161-1174  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1063-6692
Authors
Aditya Karnik  General Motors India Science Lab, Bangalore, India
Aravind Iyer  General Motors India Science Lab, Bangalore, India
Catherine Rosenberg  Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 90,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TNET.2007.909717

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we address the following two questions concerning the capacity and configuration of fixed wireless networks: (i) given a set of wireless nodes with arbitrary but fixed locations, and a set of data flows, what is the max-min achievable throughput? and (ii) how should the network be configured to achieve the optimum? We consider these questions from a networking standpoint assuming point-to-point links, and employ a rigorous physical layer model to model conflict relationships between them. Since we seek capacity results, we assume that the network is operated using an appropriate schedule of conflict-free link activations. We develop and investigate a novel optimization framework to determine the optimal throughput and configuration, i.e., flow routes, link activation schedules and physical layer parameters. Determining the optimal throughput is a computationally hard problem, in general. However, using a smart enumerative technique we obtain numerical results for several different scenarios of interest. We obtain several important insights into the structure of the optimal routes, schedules and physical layer parameters. Besides determining the achievable throughput, we believe that our optimization-based framework can also be used as a tool, for configuring scheduled wireless networks, such as those based on IEEE 802.16.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
P. Gupta and P. R. Kumar, "The capacity of wireless networks," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 388-404, Mar. 2000.
 
2
V. Mhatre and C. Rosenberg, "The impact of link layer model on the capacity of random ad hoc network," in Proc. 2006 ISIT, Jul. 2006.
 
3
L.-L. Xie and P. R. Kumar, "A network information theory for wireless communication: Scaling laws and optimal operation," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 748-767, May 2004.
 
4
J. Proakis, Digital Communications. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2000.
5
 
6
A. Karnik and A. Kumar, "Distributed optimal self-organisation in a class of wireless sensor networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2004, pp. 536-547.
 
7
S. Narayanaswamy, V. Kawadia, R. S. Sreenivas, and P. R. Kumar, "Power control in ad hoc networks: Theory, architecture, algorithm and implementation of the COMPOW protocol," in Proc. Eur. Wireless Conf., 2002.
 
8
A. Behzad and I. Rubin, "High transmission power increases the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks," IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 156-165, Jan. 2006.
 
9
 
10
11
12
 
13
H. Viswanathan and S. Mukherjee, "Throughput-range tradeoff of wireless mesh backhaul networks," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 593-602, Mar. 2006.
 
14
R. L. Cruz and A. V. Santhanam, "Optimal routing, link scheduling and power control in multihop wireless networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM , 2003, pp. 702-711.
 
15
M. J. Neely, E. Modiano, and C. E. Rohrs, "Dynamic power allocation and routing for time-varying wireless networks," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 89-103, Jan. 2005.
 
16
L. Tassiulas and A. Ephremides, "Stability properties of constrained queueing systems and scheduling policies for maximum throughput in multihop radio networks," IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1936-1948, Dec. 1992.
 
17
R. Gallager, "A minimum delay routing algorithm using distributed computation," IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. COM-25, no. 1, pp. 73-85, Jan. 1977.
 
18
V. Erceg, L. Greenstein, Y. Tjandra, S. Parkoff, A. Gupta, B. Kulic, A. Julius, and R. Bianchi, "An empirically-based path loss model for wireless channels in suburban environments," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 1205-1211, Jul. 1999.
 
19
 
20
D. Bertsekas, Nonlinear Programming. Nashua, NH: Athena Scientific, 1995.
 
21
K. Border, Fixed Point Theorems With Applications to Economics and Game Theory. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985.
 
22
 
23
S. Muthaiah, A. Iyer, A. Karnik, and C. Rosenberg, "Design of high throughput scheduled wireless mesh networks: Smart antennas," in Proc. IEEE Globecom, 2007.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Aditya Karnik: colleagues
Aravind Iyer: colleagues
Catherine Rosenberg: colleagues