ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
High performance computation and interactive display of molecular orbitals on GPUs and multi-core CPUs
Full text PdfPdf (1.01 MB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 383 archive
Proceedings of 2nd Workshop on General Purpose Processing on Graphics Processing Units table of contents
Washington, D.C.
Pages 9-18  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-517-8
Authors
John E. Stone  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Jan Saam  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
David J. Hardy  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Kirby L. Vandivort  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Wen-mei W. Hwu  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Klaus Schulten  University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 21,   Downloads (12 Months): 216,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1513895.1513897
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The visualization of molecular orbitals (MOs) is important for analyzing the results of quantum chemistry simulations. The functions describing the MOs are computed on a three-dimensional lattice, and the resulting data can then be used for plotting isocontours or isosurfaces for visualization as well as for other types of analyses. Existing software packages that render MOs perform calculations on the CPU and require runtimes of tens to hundreds of seconds depending on the complexity of the molecular system.

We present novel data-parallel algorithms for computing lattices of MOs on modern graphics processing units (GPUs) and multi-core CPUs. The fastest GPU algorithm achieves up to a 125-fold speedup over an optimized CPU implementation running on one CPU core. We also demonstrate possible benefits of dynamic GPU kernel generation and just-in-time compilation for MO calculation. We have implemented these algorithms within the popular molecular visualization program VMD, which can now produce high quality MO renderings for large systems in less than a second, and achieves the first-ever interactive animations of quantum chemistry simulation trajectories using only on-the-fly calculation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
B. M. Bode and M. S. Gordon. MacMolPlt: a graphical user interface for GAMESS. J. Mol. Graph. Model., 16(3):133--138, June 1998.
 
3
E. J. Bylaska et al. NWChem, A Computational Chemistry Package for Parallel Computers, Version 5.1. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352--0999, USA, 2007.
 
4
C. J. Cramer. Essentials of Computational Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester, England, 2004.
 
5
E. R. Davidson and D. Feller. Basis set selection for molecular calculations. Chem. Rev., 86:681--696, 1986.
 
6
M. M. Francl, W. J. Pietro, W. J. Hehre, J. S. Binkley, M. S. Gordon, D. J. DeFrees, and J. A. Pople. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XXIII. A polarization-type basis set for second-row elements. J Chem Phys, 77:3654--3665, 1982.
 
7
M. J. Frisch et al. Gaussian 03 (Revision B.05). Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
 
8
 
9
W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. Schulten. VMD -- Visual Molecular Dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics, 14:33--38, 1996.
 
10
S. Huzinaga and M. Klobukowski. Well-tempered Gaussian basis sets for the calculation of matrix Hartree-Fock wavefunctions. Chem. Phys. Lett., 212:260--264, 1993.
 
11
S. L. Moshier. Cephes Mathematical Library Version 2.8, June 2000. http://www.moshier.net/#Cephes.
 
12
A. Munschi. OpenCL Specification Version 1.0, Dec. 2008. http://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/.
13
 
14
J. D. Owens, M. Houston, D. Luebke, S. Green, J. E. Stone, and J. C. Phillips. GPU computing. Proc. IEEE, 96:879--899, 2008.
 
15
S. Portmann and H. P. Lüthi. Molekel: An interactive molecular graphics tool. CHIMIA, 54:766--770, 2000.
16
 
17
G. Schaftenaar and J. H. Nooordik. Molden: a pre-and post-processing program for molecular and electronic structures. J. Comp.-Aided Mol. Design, 14(2):123--134, 2000.
 
18
 
19
K. L. Schuchardt, B. T. Didier, T. Elsethagen, L. Sun, V. Gurumoorthi, J. Chase, J. Li, and T. L. Windus. Basis set exchange: A community database for computational sciences. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47:1045--1052, 2007.
 
20
J. E. Stone, J. C. Phillips, P. L. Freddolino, D. J. Hardy, L. G. Trabuco, and K. Schulten. Accelerating molecular modeling applications with graphics processors. J. Comp. Chem., 28:2618--2640, 2007.
 
21
I. Ufimtsev and T. Martinez. Quantum chemistry on graphical processing units. 1. strategies for two-electron integral evaluation. J. Chem. Theor. Comp., 4(2):222--231, 2008.

Collaborative Colleagues:
John E. Stone: colleagues
Jan Saam: colleagues
David J. Hardy: colleagues
Kirby L. Vandivort: colleagues
Wen-mei W. Hwu: colleagues
Klaus Schulten: colleagues