ABSTRACT
We present FORTRAN 77 subroutines that solve statistical parameter estimation problems for general nonlinear models, e.g., nonlinear least-squares, maximum likelihood, maximum quasi-likelihood, generalized nonlinear least-squares, and some robust fitting problems. The accompanying test examples include members of the generalized linear model family, extensions using nonlinear predictors (“nonlinear GLIM”), and probabilistic choice models, such as linear-in-parameter multinomial probit models. The basic method, a generalization of the NL2SOL algorithm for nonlinear least-squares, employs a model/trust-region scheme for computing trial steps, exploits special structure by maintaining a secant approximation to the second-order part of the Hessian, and adaptively switches between a Gauss-Newton and an augmented Hessian approximation. Gauss-Newton steps are computed using a corrected seminormal equations approach. The subroutines include variants that handle simple bounds on the parameters, and that compute approximate regression diagnostics.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
The PORT Mathematical Subroutine Library, 3rd ed. AT & T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, 1984.
|
| |
2
|
BARD, Y. Nonlinear Parameter Estimatton. Academic Press, 1974.
|
| |
3
|
BELSLEY, D. A., KUH, E., AND WELSCH, R.E. Regression Dtagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collineartty. Wiley, New York, 1980.
|
| |
4
|
BJ~RCK, h. Stability analysis of the method of seminormal equations for least squares problems. Linear Algebra Appl. 88/89 (Apr. 1987), 31 48.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
BUNCH, D. S. A comparison of algorithms for maximum likelihood estimation of choice models. J. Econometrtcs 38 (1988), 145-167.
|
| |
7
|
BUNCH, D. S. A comparison of algorithms for maximum likelihood estimation of finite distribution models. Working Paper UCD-GSM-WP1590, Graduate School of Management, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, 1989.
|
| |
8
|
BUNCH, D.S. MLMNP and MLMNPB: Fortran programs for maximum likelihood estimation of linear-in-parameter multinomial probit models. Rep. UCD-ITS-RR-91-14, Inst. of Transportation Studies, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, 1991.
|
| |
9
|
BUNCH, D. S., AND KITAMU~, R. Multinomial probit estimation revisited: Testing estimable model specifications, maximum likelihood algorithms, and probit integral approximations for trinomial models of household car ownership. Rep. UCD-TRG-RR-4, Transportation Research Group, Univ. of California, Davis, CA, 1990.
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
COOK, R. D., AND WEISBERG, S. Residuals and Influence in Regression. Chapman and Hall, London, 1982.
|
| |
13
|
DAaANzo, C. Multtnomial Probit: The Theory and Its Application to Demand Forecasting. Academic Press, New York, 1979.
|
| |
14
|
DAWDtAN, M., AND CARROLL, R.J. Variance function estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82,400 (Dec. 1987), 1079-1091.
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
DENNIS, J. E., JR., AND WALKER, H.F. Convergence theorems for least-change secant update methods SlAM J. Numer. Anal. 18, 6 (Dec 1981), 949-987.
|
| |
18
|
DENNIS, J E., JR., AND WALKER, H. F. Erratum: Convergence theorems for least-change secant update methods. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 19, 2 (Apr. 1982), 443.
|
 |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
FROME, E.L. Regression methods for binomial and Poisson distributed data. Manuscript, Mathematics and Statistics Research Section, Oak Ridge Natmnal Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, 1984. Presented at AAPM Fzrst Mzdyear Topzcal Symposium on Multiple Regression Analysis: Applications in the Health Sciences (Mobfie, AL, Mar. 12 16, 1984).
|
| |
21
|
GAY, D.M. Computing optimal locally constrained steps SIAM J. Scl. Stat. Comput. 2, 2 (June 1981), 186 197.
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
GAY, D.M. A trust-region approach to linearly constrained optimization. Numerical Analysis Proceedz~lgs (Dundee, 1983) D. F. Griffiths, Ed, Springer-Verlag, 72-105.
|
| |
24
|
GAY, D. M. Usage summary for selected optimization routines. Computing Science Tech. Rep. No. 153 (1990), AT & T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ. Postscript for this report is avafiable by e-maih ask netlib(~,research.att.com to send 153 from research/cstr.
|
| |
25
|
GAY, D M., AND WELSCH, R. E. Maximum likelihood and quasi-likehhood for nonlinear exponential family regression models. J. Am. Stat Assoc. 83, 404 (Dec. 1988), 990 998.
|
| |
26
|
HA~IPEL, F. R., RONCnETTI, E. M., ROUSSEEUW, P. J., AND STAHEL, W.A. Robust Statzst~cs. Wiley, 1986.
|
| |
27
|
HOLLAND, P. W., AND WELSCH, R.E. Robust regression using ~teratively reweighted leastsquares. Commun. Stat. A6, 9 (1977), 813 827.
|
| |
28
|
HUBER, P.J. Robust StatLstlcs. Wiley, New York, 1981.
|
| |
29
|
McCULLAGH, P., AND NELDER, J.A. Generahzed Lznear Models. Chapman and Hall, 1983.
|
| |
30
|
McCULLAGH, P.~ AND NELDER, J.A. Generalized Ltnear Models, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, 1989.
|
| |
31
|
Mog~, J.J. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm: Implementation and theory. In Numerical Analysis, Dundee 1977, G. A. Watson, Ed., Sprmger-Verlag, Berlim 1978, 105-116.
|
| |
32
|
MOR~, J. J., AND SORENSEN, D. C. Computing a trust region step. SIAM J. Sc~. Stat. Comput. 4, 3 (Sept. 1983), 553-572.
|
| |
33
|
NELDER, J. A., AND PREGIBON, D. An extended quasi-likelihood function. Blornetr~ka 74, 2 (Aug. 1987), 221 232.
|
| |
34
|
WALKER, H. F, AND GONGLEWSK~, J D. Quasi-Newton methods for maximum-hkelihood estimation. In Advances in Numerzcal Partial Dzfferent~al Equations and Optimization, S. Gdmez, J. P. Hennart and R. A. Tapia, Eds., SIAM, 1991, 332-345. In Proceedings of the Fifth Mexico-United States Workshop.
|
| |
35
|
WEDDERBURN, R. W. M. Quasi-likelihood functions, generahzed linear models, and the Gauss-Newton method. Biometr~ka 61, 3 (Dec. 1974), 439 447.
|
CITED BY 6
|
|
|
|
|
Will Bridewell , Narges Bani Asadi , Pat Langley , Ljupčo Todorovski, Reducing overfitting in process model induction, Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on Machine learning, p.81-88, August 07-11, 2005, Bonn, Germany
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ljupčo Todorovski , Will Bridewell , Oren Shiran , Pat Langley, Inducing hierarchical process models in dynamic domains, Proceedings of the 20th national conference on Artificial intelligence, p.892-897, July 09-13, 2005, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
|
Malcolm McPhee , Jim Oltjen , James Fadel , David Mayer , Roberto Sainz, Parameter estimation and sensitivity analysis of fat deposition models in beef steers using acslXtreme, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, v.79 n.9, p.2701-2712, May, 2009
|
|