ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the complexity of functions for random access machines
Full text PdfPdf (643 KB)
Source Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 40 ,  Issue 2  (April 1993) table of contents
Pages: 211 - 223  
Year of Publication: 1993
ISSN:0004-5411
Author
Nader H. Bshouty  Univ. of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/151261.151262
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Tight bounds are proved for Sort, Merge, Insert, Gcd of integers, Gcd of polynomials, and Rational functions over a finite inputs domain, in a random access machine with arithmetic operations, direct and indirect addressing, unlimited power for answering YES/NO questions, branching, and tables with bounded size. These bounds are also true even if additions, subtractions, multiplications, and divisions of elements by elements of the field are not counted. In a random access machine with finitely many constants and a bounded number of types of instructions, it is proved that the complexity of a function over a countable infinite domain is equal to the complexity of the function in a sufficiently large finite subdomain.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
~BSHOUTY, N.H. Euclid's GCD algorithm is not optimal. I. Upper bounds. In preparation.
 
4
~BSHOUTY, N.H. Euclid's GCD algorithm is not optimal, II. Lower bounds. In preparation.
 
5
~FRIEDMAN, N. Some results on the effect of arithmetics on comparison problems. In ~Proceedings of the 13th IEEE Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory. IEEE, New York, ~1972, pp. 139-143.
 
6
~HONG, J. On lower bounds of time complexity of some algorithms. Scienna Sinica 22 (1979), ~890-900.
 
7
~KAMINSKI, M., AND BSHOUTY, N.H. Multiplicative complexity of polynomial multiplication ~over finite field. In Proceedmgs of the 28th Amzual Symposium on Foundations of Computer ~Science. IEEE, New York, 1987.
 
8
~MANSOUR, Y., SCHIEBER, B., AND TIWARI, P. Lower bounds for greatest common divisor ~computation. In Proceedings of the 29th 1EEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science ~(Oct.), IEEE, New York, 1988, pp. 54-63,
9
10
 
11
~PAUL, W., AND SIMON, J. Decision trees and random access machines. In Monographie 30, ~L'Enseignement Mathematique, Logic and Algorithmic--An International Symposmm Held in ~Honor of Ernst Specker. Univ. Geneva Press, Geneva, Switzerland, 1982, pp. 331-340~
12
 
13
~STRASSEN, g. Die Berechnungskomplexitat von elementarsymmetrischen funktionen und ~von Interpolationskoeffizienten. Numer. Math 20 (1973), 238-251.
 
14
~YAO, A. Lower bounds for algebraic computation trees with integer inputs. In Proceedings of ~the 30th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, IEEE, New York, 1989.