ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Consistency of Topological Moves Based on the Balanced Minimum Evolution Principle of Phylogenetic Inference
Full text PdfPdf (490 KB)
Source IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (TCBB) archive
Volume 6 ,  Issue 1  (January 2009) table of contents
Pages 110-117  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1545-5963
Authors
Magnus Bordewich  University of Durham, Durham
Olivier Gascuel  CNRS-Université Montpellier II, Montpellier
Katharina T. Huber  University of East Anglia , Norwich
Vincent Moulton  University of East Anglia, Norwich
Publisher
IEEE Computer Society Press  Los Alamitos, CA, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 54,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: 10.1109/TCBB.2008.37

ABSTRACT

Many phylogenetic algorithms search the space of possible trees using topological rearrangements and some optimality criterion. FastME is such an approach that uses the {\em balanced minimum evolution (BME)} principle, which computer studies have demonstrated to have high accuracy. FastME includes two variants: {\em balanced subtree prune and regraft (BSPR)} and {\em balanced nearest neighbor interchange (BNNI)}. These algorithms take as input a distance matrix and a putative phylogenetic tree. The tree is modified using SPR or NNI operations, respectively, to reduce the BME length relative to the distance matrix, until a tree with (locally) shortest BME length is found. Following computer simulations, it has been conjectured that BSPR and BNNI are consistent, i.e. for an input distance that is a tree-metric, they converge to the corresponding tree. We prove that the BSPR algorithm is consistent. Moreover, even if the input contains small errors relative to a tree-metric, we show that the BSPR algorithm still returns the corresponding tree. Whether BNNI is consistent remains open.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. Allen and M. Steel, "Subtree Transfer Operations and Their Induced Metrics on Evolutionary Trees," Annals of Combinatorics, vol. 5, pp. 1-13, 2001.
 
2
K. Atteson, "The Performance of the Neighbor-Joining Methods of Phylogenetic Reconstruction," Algorithmica, vol. 25, pp. 251-278, 1999.
 
3
W.J. Bruno, N.D. Socci, and A.L. Halpern, "Weighted Neighbor Joining: A Likelihood Based Approach to Distance-Based Phylogeny Reconstruction," Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 17, pp. 189-197, 2000.
 
4
D. Bryant, "The Splits in the Neighbourhood of a Tree," Annals of Combinatorics, vol. 8, pp. 1-11, 2004.
 
5
 
6
R. Desper and O. Gascuel, "Fast and Accurate Phylogeny Reconstruction Algorithms Based on the Minimum Evolution Principle," J. Computational Biology, vol. 9, pp. 587-598, http:// atgc.lirmm.fr/fastme/, 2002.
 
7
R. Desper and O. Gascuel, "Theoretical Foundation of the Balanced Minimum Evolution Method of Phylogenetic Inference and Its Relationship to Weighted Least-Squares Tree Fitting," Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 21, pp. 587-598, 2004.
 
8
R. Desper and O. Gascuel, "The Minimum-Evolution Distance Based Approach to Phylogenetic Inference," Math. Evolution and Phylogeny, O. Gascuel, ed. Oxford Univ. Press, 2005.
 
9
R. Desper and O. Gascuel, "Distance-Based Phylogeny Reconstruction, (Optimal Radius; 1999, Atteson2005, Elias and Lagergren)," Encyclopedia of Algorithms, M.-Y. Kao, ed., chapter, pp. 1-99, Springer, 2008.
 
10
R. Desper, V. Lefort, H. Phan, and O. Gascuel, manuscript in preparation.
 
11
G.F. Estabrook, F.R. McMorris, and C.A. Meacham, "Comparison of Undirected Phylogenetic Trees Based on Subtrees of Four Evolutionary Units," Systematic Zoology, vol. 34, pp. 192-200, 1985.
 
12
J. Felsenstein, "PHYLIP--Phylogeny Inference Package (Version 3.2)," Cladistics, vol. 5, pp. 164-166, 1989.
 
13
J. Felsenstein, "An Alternating Least-Squares Approach to Inferring Phylogenies from Pairwise Distances," Systematic Biology , vol. 46, pp. 101-111, 1997.
 
14
J. Felsenstein, Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Assoc., Inc., 2004.
 
15
O. Gascuel, "BIONJ: An Improved Version of the NJ Algorithm Based on a Simple Model of Sequence Data," Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 14, pp. 685-695, 1997.
 
16
O. Gascuel and S. Guillemot, "Sur la Consistance et le Rayon de Sécurité du Principe d'Évolution Minimum," internal report in French (available on request), 2005.
 
17
 
18
K.K. Kidd and L.A. Sgaramella-Zonta, "Phylogenetic Analysis: Concepts and Methods," Am. J. Human Genetics, vol. 23, pp. 235-252, 1971.
 
19
 
20
Y. Pauplin, "Direct Calculation of Tree Length Using a Distance Matrix," J. Molecular Evolution, vol. 51, pp. 66-85, 2000.
 
21
A. Rzhetsky and M. Nei, "Theoretical Foundation of the Minimum-Evolution Method of Phylogenetic Inference," Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 10, pp. 1073-1095, 1993.
 
22
D. Robinson and L. Foulds, "Comparison of Phylogenetic Trees," Math. Biosciences, vol. 53, pp. 131-147, 1981.
 
23
N. Saitou and M. Nei, "The Neighbor-Joining Method: A New Method for Reconstructing Phylogenetic Trees," Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 4, pp. 406-424, 1987.
 
24
P.H.A Sneath and R.R. Sokal, Numerical Taxonomy, pp. 230-234. W.K. Freeman, 1973.
 
25
C. Semple and M. Steel, Phylogenetics. Oxford Univ. Press, 2003.
 
26
C. Semple and M. Steel, "Cyclic Permutations and Evolutionary Trees," Advances in Applied Math., vol. 32, pp. 669-680, 2004.
 
27
M. Steel and D. Penny, "Distributions of Tree Comparison Metrics--Some New Results," Systematic Biology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 126-141, 1993.
 
28
K. Strimmer and A. von Haeseler, "Quartet Puzzling: A Quartet Maximum Likelihood Method for Reconstructing Tree Topologies," Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 13, pp. 964-969, 1996.
 
29
D.L. Swofford, PAUP*, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods). Sinauer Assoc., Inc., 2003.
 
30
L.S. Vinh and A. von Haeseler, "Shortest Triplet Clustering: Reconstructing Large Phylogenies Using Representative Sets," BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 6, no. 92, pp. 1-14, 2005.
 
31
S.J. Willson, "Minimum Evolution Using Ordinary Least Squares Is Less Robust Than Neighbor-Joining," Bull. Math. Biology, vol. 67, pp. 261-279, 2005.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Magnus Bordewich: colleagues
Olivier Gascuel: colleagues
Katharina T. Huber: colleagues
Vincent Moulton: colleagues