|
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Albrecht,A.J.Measuring application development prodecitivity. In GUIDESHARE: Proceeedings of the IBM Applications Development Sysprosium (Monterey,Calif.),1979,pp,83- 92
|
| |
2
|
Albrecht,A.J and Gaffncy, J. Software function, source lines of code, and development effort prediction; A software science validation .IEEE Trans Softw. Eng,SE-9,6(1983),639- 648.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Behrens. C.A Measuring the Productivity of computer system developemetn activities with Function Points ,IEEE Trans Softw.Eng SE.9 6 (1983)648-652.
|
| |
6
|
Bock, D,b and Klepper, R. FT_S:A simplified Function Point counting method .Working Paper, Southren IILionois Univ. at Edwardesville III., 1990
|
| |
7
|
Carmines E.G. and Zeller,R.A reliability and Validuty Assessment Sage publication, Beverly Hills,Calif., 1979.
|
| |
8
|
Cohen.J., Statistical poweer Analysis for the Behaviral Sciences.Academic, Press, New York,N.Y. 1977
|
| |
9
|
Connolley, M.J. An empirical Study of Function Points analysis reliability. Masters thesis, MTT Sloan School of Management, Cambridges, MAss., 1990.
|
| |
10
|
Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. Quasi-Experimentaition: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Houghton-Miffling, Boston, 1979.
|
| |
11
|
Cooprinder, J. and Henderson, J.A. multi-dimensional approach to performance evalutation for I/S development. Working Paper 197, MIT Center for Information Systems Research, Cambridge, MAss., 1989.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Desharnais, J.M. Analyse statistique de la productivite des projects de development en informatique a partir de la technique des points de fonction (English version). Masters thesis, Universe du Quebec, Montreal, 1988.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Emrick, R.D. Software development prodcutivity second industry studty. In the 1988 International Function Point Users Group Spring Conference Proceedings (Dallas, Tex.). IFPUG, Westerville, Ohio, pp. 1-44.
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
Maglitta, J. Its's reality times. Computerworld (1991), 81-84.
|
| |
20
|
Perry, W.E. The best measures for measuring data processing quality and productivity. Tech. Rep. Quality Assurance Institute, 1986.
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
Rubin, H.A. Macroestimation of software development parameters: The estimacs system. In IEEE SOFTFAIR Conference on Software Development Tools, Techniques and Alternatives. IEEE, New York, N.Y., 1983.
|
| |
24
|
Rubin, H.A. Measure for measure. Computerworld (1991), 77-79.
|
| |
25
|
Rudolph, E.E. Productivity in computer application development. Working Paper 9, Univ. of Auckland, Dept. of Management Studies, Auckland, New Zealand, 14983.
|
| |
26
|
Scheffe, H. Analysis of Variance, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1959.
|
| |
27
|
Sprouls, J. IFPUG Function Point Counting Practices Manual Release 3.0 International Funciton Point USers Group, WEsterville, Ohio, 1990.
|
| |
28
|
|
| |
29
|
Topper, A. CASE: A peek at commercial developers uncovers some clues to the mystery, Computerworkd, 24, 15(1990), 61-64.
|
 |
30
|
J. M. Verner , G. Tate , B. Jackson , R. G. Hayward, Technology dependence in function point analysis: a case study and critical review, Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Software engineering, p.375-382, May 1989, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
[doi> 10.1145/74587.74639]
|
REVIEW
"John E. Martin : Reviewer"
This research study was conducted to test the accuracy and
reliability of the function point software sizing metric. Basically, the
study was designed around the hypothesis that estimate replicability is
an indicator of estimate reliability. T
more...
|