ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Path selection for monitoring unexpected systematic timing effects
Full text PdfPdf (173 KB)
Source
Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2009 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference table of contents
Yokohama, Japan
SESSION: Verification, test, and yield table of contents
Pages 781-786  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-4244-2748-2
Authors
Nicholas Callegari  University of California, Santa Barbara
Pouria Bastani  University of California, Santa Barbara
Li-C. Wang  University of California, Santa Barbara
Sreejit Chakravarty  LSI Corporation
Alexander Tetelbaum  LSI Corporation
Sponsors
: IEEE Circuits and Systems Society
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEICE ESS : Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers - Engineering Sciences Society
IPSJ SIGSLDM : Information Processing Society of Japan - SIG System LSI Design Methodology
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 12,   Downloads (12 Months): 39,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a novel path selection methodology to select paths for monitoring unexpected systematic timing effects. The methodology consists of three components: path filtering, path encoding, and path clustering. Given a large set of critical paths, in path filtering, the goal is to filter out paths that cannot be functionally sensitized. To explore the space of unexpected timing effects, a set of features are defined to encode paths into path vectors. Each feature is a source of concern that may potentially contribute to the cause of an unexpected timing effect. Finally, a kernel-based clustering algorithm is employed to group similar path vectors into clusters from which the best representative paths are selected for post-silicon monitoring. The effectiveness of our proposed methodology is demonstrated through experiments on an industrial ASIC design.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
L. Milor, L. Yu, B. Liu "Logic Product Speed Evaluation and Forecasting During the Early Phases of Process Technology Development Using Ring Oscillator data," Proc. International Workshop on Statistical Metrology, 1997, pp. 20--23.
2
3
 
4
M. Bhushan, et al, "Ring oscillator for CMOS process tuning and variability control," IEEE Trans. on Semiconductor Manufacturing, Vol. 19, pp. 10--18, 2006
 
5
M. Ketchen, et al, "High speed test structures for in-line process monitoring and model calibration," Proc. IEEE Inter. Conf.Microelectronic Test Structures, 2005.
 
6
R. Franch et al. On-chip Timing Uncertainty Measurements on IBM Microprocessors Proc. ITC, 2007.
 
7
P. Bastani, et al. Diagnosis of design-silicon timing mismatch with feature encoding and importance ranking- the methodology explained, ITC, in press, 2008.
8
9
10
 
11
12
 
13
14
 
15
J. C. Bezdek, C. Coray, R. Gunderson, J. Watson, "Detection and Characterization of Cluster Substructure I. Linear Structure: Fuzzy c-Lines," SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 339--357, 1981.
 
16
M. S. Aldenderfer, R. K. Blashfield, Cluster Analysis, Sage Publications, 1984.
 
17
Collaborative Colleagues:
Nicholas Callegari: colleagues
Pouria Bastani: colleagues
Li-C. Wang: colleagues
Sreejit Chakravarty: colleagues
Alexander Tetelbaum: colleagues