ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A multilevel analytical placement for 3D ICs
Full text PdfPdf (209 KB)
Source
Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2009 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference table of contents
Yokohama, Japan
SESSION: Beyond traditional floorplanning and placement table of contents
Pages 361-366  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-4244-2748-2
Authors
Jason Cong  University of California, Los Angeles and California NanoSystems Institute, Los Angeles, CA
Guojie Luo  California NanoSystems Institute, Los Angeles, CA
Sponsors
: IEEE Circuits and Systems Society
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEICE ESS : Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers - Engineering Sciences Society
IPSJ SIGSLDM : Information Processing Society of Japan - SIG System LSI Design Methodology
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 27,   Downloads (12 Months): 97,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In this paper we propose a multilevel non-linear programming based 3D placement approach that minimizes a weighted sum of total wirelength and TS via number subject to area density constraints. This approach relaxes the discrete layer assignments so that they are continuous in the z-direction and the problem can be solved by an analytical global placer. A key idea is to do the overlap removal and device layer assignment simultaneously by adding a density penalty function for both area & TS via density constraints. Experimental results show that this analytical placer in a multilevel framework is effective to achieve trade-offs between wirelength and TS via number. Compared to the recently published transformation-based 3D placement method [1], we are able to achieve on average 12% shorter wirelength and 29% fewer TS via compared to their cases with best wirelength; we are also able to achieve on average 20% shorter wirelength and 50% fewer TS via number compared to their cases with best TS via numbers.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
4
 
5
 
6
G.-J. Nam and J. Cong, "Modern Circuit Placement: Best Practices and Results," Springer, New York, 2007.
 
7
J. Cong and J. Shinnerl, "Multilevel Optimization in VLSICAD," Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 2003.
 
8
J. Cong and M. Xie, "A Robust Mixed-Size Legalization and Detailed Placement Algorithm," IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1349--1362, August 2008.
 
9
J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, "Numerical Optimization 2nd ed.," Springer, 2006.
 
10
W. C. Naylor, R. Donelly, and L. Sha, "Non-linear Optimization System and Method for Wire Length and Delay Optimization for an Automatic Electric Circuit Placer," US Patent 6301693, October, 2001.
11
 
12
13
14
15
 
16
17