ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Trade-off analysis between timing error rate and power dissipation for adaptive speed control with timing error prediction
Full text PdfPdf (129 KB)
Source
Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 2009 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference table of contents
Yokohama, Japan
SESSION: Advances in timing analysis and modeling table of contents
Pages 266-271  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-4244-2748-2
Authors
Hiroshi Fuketa  Osaka University, Japan and JST, CREST
Masanori Hashimoto  Osaka University, Japan and JST, CREST
Yukio Mitsuyama  Osaka University, Japan and JST, CREST
Takao Onoye  Osaka University, Japan and JST, CREST
Sponsors
: IEEE Circuits and Systems Society
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
IEICE ESS : Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers - Engineering Sciences Society
IPSJ SIGSLDM : Information Processing Society of Japan - SIG System LSI Design Methodology
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 42,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Timing margin of a chip varies chip by chip due to manufacturing variability, and depends on operating environment and aging. Adaptive speed control with timing error prediction is a promising approach to mitigate the timing margin variation, whereas it inherently has a critical risk of timing error occurrence when a circuit is slowed down. This paper presents how to evaluate the relation between timing error rate and power dissipation in self-adaptive circuits with timing error prediction. The discussion is experimentally validated using a 32-bit ripple carry adder in subthreshold operation in a 90nm CMOS process. We show a trade-off between timing error rate and power dissipation, and reveal the dependency of the trade-off on design parameters.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Kao, et al., "A 175-mV Multiply-Accumulate Unit Using an Adaptive Supply Voltage and Body Bias Architecture," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 37, pp. 1545--1554, Nov. 2002.
 
2
S. Das, et al., "A Self-Tuning DVS Processor Using Delay-Error Detection and Correction," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 41, pp. 792--804, Apr. 2006.
 
3
D. Blaauw, et al., "Razor II: In Situ Error Detection and Correction for PVT and SER Tolerance," in Int. Solid-State Circuits Conference Dig. Tech. Papers, pp. 400--401, Feb. 2008.
 
4
 
5
T. Nakura, et al., "Fine-Grain Redundant Logic Using Defect-Prediction Flip-Flops," in Int. Solid-State Circuits Conference Dig. Tech. Papers, pp. 402--403, Feb. 2007.
 
6
J. Tschanz, et al., "Adaptive Body Bias for Reducing Impacts of Die-to-Die and Within-Die Parameter Variations on Microprocessor Frequency and Leakage," IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 37, pp. 1396--1402, Nov. 2002.
Collaborative Colleagues:
Hiroshi Fuketa: colleagues
Masanori Hashimoto: colleagues
Yukio Mitsuyama: colleagues
Takao Onoye: colleagues