Take a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.

ABSTRACT

With increasing availability of predefined IP (Intellectual Properties) blocks and inexpensive microprocessors, embedded system designers are faced with more design choices than ever. On the other hand, there is a constant pressure on reducing the time to market. However, as the IP blocks are provided by different vendors, they differ in their interfaces. In order to improve design reuse, methods for combining heterogeneous IP blocks with incompatible protocols and I/Os are needed. In this paper, we propose an interface synthesis method that uses the UML notation to model the interfaces of predefined components and glue logic within the standard OCP-compliant environment. We built a code generator to produce the interface adapters from the UML models. We experimented with our approach using simple-bus and a MPEG-2 decoder as case studies.

REFERENCES

• 1: Borriello G., Chou P., Ortega R, "Embedded System Co-Design: Towards Portability and Rapid Integration, Hardware/Software Codesign", NATO ASI Series, pp. 1--28, 1996
• 2: Chandra, R., "IP-Reuse and platform base designs, system level design with embedded platforms". DAC Tutorial, 2000
• 3: Pai Chou , Ross B. Ortega , Gaetano Borriello, Interface co-synthesis techniques for embedded systems, Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design, p.280-287, November 05-09, 1995, San Jose, California, United States
• 4: Ki-Seok Chung , Rajesh K. Gupta , C. L. Liu, An algorithm for synthesis of system-level interface circuits, Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design, p.442-447, November 10-14, 1996, San Jose, California, United States
• 5: Damaševičius, R., and Štuikys, V., "Soft IP customization models based on high-level abstractions", Information Technology and Control, Kaunas, Technologija, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 125--134. 2005
• 6: Feig, E., and Linzer, E., "Discrete cosine transform algorithms for image data compression", Proceedings of Electronic Imaging '90 East, pp. 84--87, 1990.
• 7: Guo, Z., Mitra, A., and Najjar, W., "Automation of IP core interface generation for reconfigurable computing", Int. Conference on Field Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL 2006), Madrid, Spain, August, 2006.
• 8: Michael Keating , Pierre Bricaud, Reuse methodology manual: for system-on-a-chip designs, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 1998
• 9: Kun, T., Wang, H., and Bian, J. N., "A generic interface modeling approach for SOC design", ICSICT'04, pp. 1400--1403, Beijing, 2004.
• 10: Bill Lin , Steven Vercauteren, Synthesis of concurrent system interface modules with automatic protocol conversion generation, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design, p.101-108, November 06-10, 1994, San Jose, California, United States
• 11: Moving Picture Experts Group. http://www.mpeg.org.
• 12: Mukherjee, R., Jones, A., and Banerjee, P., "System level synthesis of multiple IP blocks in the behavioral synthesis tool", Int. Conf. on Parallel and Distributed Computing and Systems (PDCS), November 2003.
• 13: OCP-IP, http://www.ocp-ip.org.
• 14: OMG UML documentation, http://www.uml.org
• 15: Vytautas Štuikys , Robertas Damaševičius, Soft IP Customisation Model Based on Metaprogramming Techniques, Informatica, v.15 n.1, p.111-126, January 2004
• 16: Telelogic Rhapsody, http://www.telelogic.com/
• 17: SystemC: http://www.systemc.org
• 18: Velocity website. http://velocity.apache.org/
• 19: J. Zhu, MetaRTL: raising the abstraction level of RTL design, Proceedings of the conference on Design, automation and test in Europe, p.71-76, March 2001, Munich, Germany