ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Context-sensitive static transistor-level IR analysis
Full text PdfPdf (184 KB)
Source
International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design table of contents
San Jose, California
SESSION: Exploiting logic constraints for noise analysis table of contents
Pages 797-802  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN ~ ISSN:1092-3152 , 978-1-4244-2820-5
Authors
Weiqing Guo  Silicon design CAD, Advanced Micro Devices, Sunnyvale, CA
Yu Zhong  Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL
Tom Burd  Silicon design CAD, Advanced Micro Devices, Sunnyvale, CA
Sponsors
: IEEE CASS/CANDE
: IEEE Council on Electronic Design Automation (CEDA)
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

With advances in semiconductor process technology, chip power density has dramatically increased, making power grid integrity a critical concern at all stages of the design process. Given the inherent difficulty of capturing worst-case IR drops for all logic gates with dynamic vectors, a static flow is essential for verifying grid integrity on complex chip designs, especially microprocessors. A novel static transistor-level IR drop analysis flow which significantly reduces the conservatism of other static flows is presented. The key feature of this flow is a fast NAND decision diagram (NDD) algorithm, a lightweight variant of a boolean decision diagram (BDD) with the capacity to effectively process device transition exclusions in a per logical-device, context-sensitive fashion, thereby radically reducing the conservatism typical of static analysis.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. I. Bahar, E. A. Frohm, C. M. Gaona, G. D. Hachtel, E. Macii, A. Pardo, and F. Somenzi. Algebraic decision diagrams and their applications. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 1993.
2
3
 
4
F. H. B. Jr. Network sensitivity and noise analysis simplified. IEEE Trans. on Circuit Theory, May 1973.
 
5
6
 
7
J. Kozhaya, S. R. Nassif, and F. N. Najm. A multigrid-like technique for power grid analysis. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design, 21(10):1148--1160, 2002.
8
 
9
S. Li, J. Demmel, and J. Gilbert. SuperLU user's guide. http://crd.lbl.gov/xiaoye/SuperLU/.
 
10
S. Lin, M. Nagata, K. Shimazake, K. Satoh, M. Sumita, H. Tsujikawa, and A. T. Yang. Full-chip vectorless dynamic power integrity analysis and verification against 100uv/100ps-resolution measurement. Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 2004.
11
 
12
H. Qian, S. R. Nassif, and S. S. Sapatnekar. Early-stage power grid analysis for uncertain working modes. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 24:676--682, May 2005.
 
13
F. Somenzi. CU decision diagram package. http://vlsi.colorado.edu/fabio/CUDD/.
14
 
15
M. Zhao, R. V. Panda, S. S. Sapatnekar, and D. Blaauw. Hierarchical analysis of power distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Intergrated Circuits and Systems, 21(2):159--168, Feb 2002.
 
16
 
17
Collaborative Colleagues:
Weiqing Guo: colleagues
Yu Zhong: colleagues
Tom Burd: colleagues