Robust reconfigurable filter design using analytic variability quantification techniques

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we develop a variability-aware design methodology for reconfigurable filters used in multi-standard wireless systems. To model the impact of statistical circuit component variations on the predicted manufacturing yield, we implement several different analytic variability quantification techniques based on a double-sided implementation of the first and second order reliability methods (FORM and SORM), which provide several orders of magnitude improvement in computational complexity over statistical sampling methods. Leveraging these efficient analytic variability quantification techniques, we employ an optimization approach using Sequential Quadratic Programming to simultaneously determine the fixed and tunable/switchable circuit element values in an arbitrary-order canonical filter to improve the overall robustness of the filter design when statistical variations are present. The results indicate that reconfigurable filters and impedance matching networks designed using the proposed methodology meet the specified performance requirements with a 26% average absolute yield improvement over circuits designed using deterministic techniques.

REFERENCES

• 1: A. Batra et al., "Design of a Multiband OFDM System for Realistic UWB Channel Environments," IEEE Trans. MTT, pp. 2123--2138, 2004.
• 2: J.-F. Luy et al., "Configurable RF Receiver Architectures," IEEE Micro. Mag., pp. 75--82, 2004.
• 3: P. Wambacq et al., "CAD for RF Circuits," in Proc. DATE, 2001.
• 4: F. Tzeng, A. Jahanian, and P. Heydari, "A Multiband Inductor-Reuse CMOS Low-Noise Amplifier," IEEE Trans. CAS-II, pp. 209--213, 2008.
• 5: Ji-Hoon Kim , Young-Kyun Jang , Hyung-Joun Yoo, Design of reconfigurable RF front-end for multi-standard receiver using switchable passive networks, Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, v.50 n.2, p.81-88, February 2007 [doi>10.1007/s10470-006-9000-1]
• 6: Clark T.-C. Nguyen, RF MEMS in wireless architectures, Proceedings of the 42nd annual conference on Design automation, June 13-17, 2005, Anaheim, California, USA [doi>10.1145/1065579.1065690]
• 7: D. Qiao et al., "An Intelligently Controlled RF Power Amplifier with a Reconfigurable MEMS-Varactor Tuner," IEEE Trans. MTT, pp. 1089--1097, 2005.
• 8: C. Lugo and J. Papapolymerou, "Six-State Reconfigurable Filter Structure for Antenna Based Systems," IEEE Trans. Ant. Prop., pp. 479--483, 2006.
• 9: A. R. Brown and G. M. Rebeiz, "A Varactor Tuned RF Filter," IEEE Trans. MTT, pp. 1157--1160, 2000.
• 10: B.-W. Kim and S.-W. Yun, "Varactor-Tuned Combline Bandpass Filter Using Step-Impedance Microstrip Lines," IEEE Trans. MTT, pp. 1279--1283, 2004.
• 11: K. Entesari and Rebeiz, "A 12-18-GHz Three-Pole RF MEMS Tunable Filter," IEEE Trans. MTT, pp. 2566--2571, 2005.
• 12: J. Nath et al., "An Electronically Tunable Microstrip Bandpass Filter Using Thin-Film Barium-Strontium-Titanate (BST) Varactors," IEEE Trans. MTT, pp. 2707--2712, 2005.
• 13: Arthur Nieuwoudt , Jamil Kawa , Yehia Massoud, Automated design of tunable impedance matching networks for reconfigurable wireless applications, Proceedings of the 45th annual conference on Design automation, June 08-13, 2008, Anaheim, California [doi>10.1145/1391469.1391596]
• 14: L. Dussopt and G. M. Rebeiz, "Intermodulation Distortion and Power Handling in RF MEMS Switches, Varactors, and Tunable Filters," IEEE Trans. MTT, pp. 1247--1256, 2003.
• 15: Q. S. I. Lim, A. V. Kordesch, and R. A. Keating, "Performance Comparison of MIM Capacitors and Metal Finger Capacitors for Analog and RF Applications," in Proc. RF and Micro. Conf., 2004.
• 16: A. Nieuwoudt and Y. Massoud, "Variability-Aware Multi-Level Integrated Spiral Inductor Synthesis," IEEE Trans. CAD, pp. 2613--2625, 2006.
• 17: R. Levy, R. V. Snyder, and G. Matthaei, "Design of Microwave Filters," IEEE Trans. MTT, pp. 783--793, 2002.
• 18: J.-S. G. Hong and M. J. Lancaster, Microstrip Filters for RF/Microwave Applications. Wiley, 2001.
• 19: R. Billinton and W. Li, Reliability Assessment of Electric Power Systems Using Monte Carlo Methods. Plenum Press, 1994.
• 20: M. D. McKay , R. J. Beckman , W. J. Conover, A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, v.42 n.1, p.55-61, Feb. 2000 [doi>10.2307/1271432]
• 21: P. J. Smith, M. Shafi, and H. Gao, "Quick Simulation: A Review of Importance Sampling Techniques in Communications Systems," IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm., pp. 597--613, 1997.
• 22: D. Wei and S. Rahman, "Structural Reliability Analysis by Univariate Decomposition and Numerical Integration," Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics, pp. 27--38, 2007.
• 23: M. S. Eldred and B. J. Bichon, "Second-Order Reliability Formulations in DAKOTA/UQ," in Proc. Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., 2006.
• 24: Y.-G. Zhao and T. Ono, "A General Procedure for First/Second-Order Reliability Method (FORM/SORM)," Structural Safety, pp. 95--112, 1999.
• 25: J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization. Springer, 1999.
• 26: T. G. S. M. Rijks et al., "RF MEMS Tunable Capacitors with Large Tuning Ratio," in Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. MEMS, 2004.