ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Guaranteed stable projection-based model reduction for indefinite and unstable linear systems
Full text PdfPdf (222 KB)
Source
International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design table of contents
San Jose, California
SESSION: Advances in model order reduction table of contents
Pages 728-735  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN ~ ISSN:1092-3152 , 978-1-4244-2820-5
Authors
Bradley N. Bond  Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Luca Daniel  Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Sponsors
: IEEE CASS/CANDE
: IEEE Council on Electronic Design Automation (CEDA)
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 36,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

In this work we present a stability-preserving projection framework for model reduction of linear systems. Specifically, given one projection matrix (e.g. a right-projection matrix), we derive a set of linear constraints for the other projection matrix (e.g. the left-projection matrix) resulting in a projection framework that is guaranteed to generate a stable reduced model. Several efficient techniques for solving the proposed system of constraints are presented, including an optimization problem formulation for finding the optimal stabilizing projection, and a formulation with computational complexity independent of the size of the original system. The resulting algorithms can create accurate stable and passive models of arbitrary indefinite systems at a significantly cheaper cost than existing methods such as balanced truncation. Nevertheless, our algorithms integrate fully and effortlessly with most of the available standard model order reduction approaches for very large systems generated in VLSI applications (such as moment-matching methods, POD, or Poor Man's TBR), which can guarantee stability and passivity only in very specialized cases. Our algorithms have been tested on a large variety of typical VLSI applications, including field-solver-extracted models of RF inductors for analog applications, power distribution grids for large VLSI digital integrated circuits, and MEMS devices for sensing and actuation applications. The results have been successfully compared to those from existing and much more expensive stabilizing reduction techniques.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Eric Grimme. Krylov Projection Methods for Model Reduction. PhD thesis, Coordinated-Science Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, 1997.
 
2
Zhaojun Bai, Peter Feldmann, and Roland W. Freund. Stable and passive reduced order models based on partial pade approximation via the lanczos process. Technical Report Numerical Analysis Manuscript No.97-3-10, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, New Jersey, October 1997.
 
3
A. Odabasioglu, M. Celik, and L. T. Pileggi. PRIMA: passive reduced order interconnect macromodeling algorithm. IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 17(8):645--654, August 1998.
 
4
 
5
L. M. Silveira, M. Kamon, I. Elfadel, and J. K. White. Coordinate-transformed arnoldi algorithm for generating guarantee stable reduced-order models of RLC. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 169(3--4):377--89, February 1999.
 
6
 
7
 
8
Bruce Moore. Principal Component Analysis in Linear Systems: Controllability, Observability, and Model Reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-26(1):17--32, February 1981.
 
9
J. R. Phillips, L. Daniel, and M. Silveira. Guaranteed passive balancing transformations for model order reduction. IEEE Trans. on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, 22(8):1027--41, Aug 2003.
 
10
 
11
S. Sastry. Nonlinear Systems: Analysis, Stability, and Control. Springer, New York, 1999.
 
12
T. Stykel. Stability and inertia theorems for generalized lyapunov equations. Linear Algebra and its Applications, volume=.
 
13
J. C. Willems. Dissipative dynamical systems. Arch. Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 45:321--393, 1972.
 
14
Anders Rantzer. On the Kalman-Yakubovich-Popov lemma. Systems and Control Letters, 27(5), January 1996.
 
15
R. Freund and F. Jarre. An extension of the positive real lemma to descriptor systems. Technical Report Numerical Analysis Manuscript No.00-3-09, Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Murray Hill, New Jersey, December 2000.
 
16
 
17
R. W. Freund and P. Feldmann. The SyMPVL algorithm and its applications to interconnect simulation. In Proceedings of the 1997 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices, pages 113--116. IEEE, 1997.
 
18
K. Willcox and J. Peraire. Balanced model reduction via the proper orthogonal decomposition. In Proceedings of the 15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Anaheim, CA, June 2001.
 
19
 
20
J. F. Sturm. Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones. Optimization Methods and Software, 11--12:625--653, 1999.
 
21
J. Lfberg. Yalmip: A toolbox for modeling and optimization in MATLAB. In Proceedings of the CACSD Conference, Taipei, Taiwan, 2004.
 
22
 
23
Fastmaxwell. http://www.rle.mit.edu/cpg/fastmaxwell.
 
24
S. D. Senturia E. Hung, Y.-J. Yahg. Low-order models for fast dynamical simulation of mems microstructures. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Solid State Sensors and Actuators, volume 2, pages 1101--1104, 1997.
Collaborative Colleagues:
Bradley N. Bond: colleagues
Luca Daniel: colleagues