ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On the decreasing significance of large standard cells in technology mapping
Full text PdfPdf (553 KB)
Source
International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design table of contents
San Jose, California
SESSION: Physical synthesis and optimization table of contents
Pages 116-121  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN ~ ISSN:1092-3152 , 978-1-4244-2820-5
Authors
Jae-sun Seo  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Igor L. Markov  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Dennis Sylvester  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
David Blaauw  University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Sponsors
: IEEE CASS/CANDE
: IEEE Council on Electronic Design Automation (CEDA)
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 58,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Technology scaling reduces gate delays while wire delays may increase. Our work studies the interaction of this phenomenon with technology mapping and its impact on modern EDA flows. In particular, we demonstrate that the use of larger standard cells increases the number of long wires and may undermine circuit delay optimization at 65nm and below. Experiments with 130nm, 90nm, 65nm, and 45nm industrial CMOS technology suggest that limiting the use of larger standard cells in technology mapping becomes more effective at 65nm and 45nm node, resulting in up to 12% improvement in critical path delay on large benchmark circuits.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
P. Saxena et al., "Repeater scaling and its impact on CAD," IEEE Transactions of Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 451--463, April 2004.
5
 
6
Y. Ismail and E. Friedman, "Optimum repeater insertion based on a CMOS delay model for on-chip RLC interconnect," Proc. International ASIC Conference, pp. 369--373, 1998
 
7
A. Nalamalpu and W. Burleson, "Repeater insertion in deep sub-micron CMOS: ramp-based analytical model and placement sensitivity analysis," Proc. International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, pp. 766--799, 2000.
8
9
 
10
 
11
G. Stenz et al., "Performance optimization by interacting netlist transformations and placement," IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 350--358, March 2000.
 
12
IWLS 2005 benchmarks. http://iwls.org/iwls2005/benchmarks.html.
 
13
E. Wein and J. Benkoski, "Hard macros will revolutionize SoC Design," EE Design, August 2004. http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=26807055.
14
15
16
 
17
M. Moreinis et al., "Logic gates as repeater (LGR) for area-efficient timing optimization," IEEE Trans. on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, Vol. 14, No. 11, pp. 1276--1281, November 2006.
Collaborative Colleagues:
Jae-sun Seo: colleagues
Igor L. Markov: colleagues
Dennis Sylvester: colleagues
David Blaauw: colleagues