ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
More Moore: foolish, feasible, or fundamentally different?
Source
International Conference on Computer Aided Design archive
Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design table of contents
San Jose, California
SESSION: Panel table of contents
Article No. 9  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN ~ ISSN:1092-3152 , 978-1-4244-2820-5
Authors
Rob Aitken  ARM, Sunnyvale, CA
Jerry Bautista  Intel Corp., Santa Clara, CA
Wojceich Maly  Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA
Jan Rabaey  Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA
Sponsors
: IEEE CASS/CANDE
: IEEE Council on Electronic Design Automation (CEDA)
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
IEEE Press  Piscataway, NJ, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): n/a,   Downloads (12 Months): n/a,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Moore's law has been a foundation of modern electronics, sustained primarily by scaling. But can this continue despite the serious problems of litho, variability, device physics, and cost? This panel looks at several possibilities. Perhaps Moore's law will muddle through, as it has so far, with a combination of tools, process, and design. But even if technically possible, Moore's law is in practice driven by economics, and economics might turn against further scaling. Also, we've all seen how performance of single cores has topped out, despite scaling. Might this be a fundamental problem with planar technologies, prompting the need to go 3-D to get further performance increases? Or might CMOS itself give way to other technologies, allowing Moore's law yet another respite? Compare and contrast for yourself these four very different visions of the future of your job, your industry, and your personal gadgets.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Rob Aitken: colleagues
Jerry Bautista: colleagues
Wojceich Maly: colleagues
Jan Rabaey: colleagues