ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A readiness assessment framework for e-government planning: design and application
Full text PdfPdf (165 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 351 archive
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance table of contents
Cairo, Egypt
SESSION: Readiness table of contents
Pages 403-410  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-386-0
Authors
Mohamed Shareef  National Centre for Information Technology, Republic of Maldives
Adegboyega Ojo  United Nations University IIST, Macao
Tomasz Janowski  United Nations University IIST, Macao
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 40,   Downloads (12 Months): 234,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1509096.1509180
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The availability of information on electronic government readiness is a critical factor in developing effective e-government policies and strategies. Although there are many readiness assessment instruments in the public domain, there are no clear guidelines on how these instruments can be reused as frameworks in carrying out assessment in specific contexts, such as in e-government planning or implementation. The design of readiness assessment frameworks requires clear specification of the assessment purpose and the design of concrete instruments explicitly based on the information requirements. Usually, these information needs are modular and can be satisfied by any instrument composed from the required set of assessment components. In this paper, we examine the requirements for a readiness assessment framework to support e-government planning and propose an assessment framework consisting of a set of assessment perspectives. Each of these perspectives is mapped to a corresponding set of concrete assessment components (partly derived from other major e-government assessment frameworks) satisfying the information requirements of these perspectives. The componentized framework allows for easy substitution or specialization of specific components to suit different contexts or assessment scenarios. As an example, we show how this framework can be used for developing a readiness assessment instrument to support e-government planning in Maldives.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Accenture. eGovernment Leadership: Rhetoric vs Reality -- Closing the Gap. Accenture, 2001.
 
2
Accenture. eGovernment Leadership: High Performance, Maximum Value. Accenture, 2002.
 
3
Accenture. eGovernment Leadership: Engaging the Customer. Accenture, 2003.
 
4
Accenture. eGovernment Leadership: High Performance, Maximum Value. Accenture, 2004.
 
5
Accenture. Leadership in Customer Service: New Expectations, New Experiences. Accenture, 2005.
 
6
Accenture. Leadership in Customer Service: Building the Trust. Accenture, 2006.
 
7
Accenture. Leadership in Customer Service: Delivering on the Promise. Accenture, 2007.
 
8
APEC. APEC e-Commerce Readiness Assessment Initiative. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, 2000. http://www.apec.org/apec/ (accessed: 24 July 2008).
 
9
bridges.org. E-readiness assessment: Who is Doing What and Where? bridges.org, 2005.
 
10
bridges.org. E-Ready for What? E-Readiness in Developing Countries: Current Status and Prospects Towards the Millennium Development Goals.
 
11
Nazli Choucri, Vincent Maugis, Stuart Madnick, and Michael Siegel. GLOBAL e-READINESS -- for WHAT? Center for eBusiness@MIT, 2003. Paper 177.
 
12
CID. Readiness for the Networked World: A Guide for the Developing Countries. Information Technologies Group, Center for International Development, Harvard University, 2008.
 
13
Economist. The 2007 e-readiness rankings: Raising the bar. Economist Intelligence Unit, The Economist, 2007.
 
14
Elsa Estevez, Tomasz Janowski, and Adegboyega K. Ojo. Planning for e-government -- a service-oriented agency survey. UNU-IIST Report No. 361, UNU-IIST, Macau SAR China, 2007.
 
15
UNDESA. Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective. UNDESA, New York, 2001.
 
16
UNDESA. United Nations Global E-government Survey 2003. UNDESA, New York, 2003.
 
17
UNDESA. United Nations Global e-Government Readiness Report 2004 -- Towards Access for Opportunity. UNDESA, New York, 2004.
 
18
UNDESA. United Nations Global e-Government Readiness Report 2005 -- From e-Government to e-Inclusion. UNDESA, New York, 2005.
 
19
UNDESA. United Nations e-Government Survey 2008 -- From e-Government to Connected Governance. UNDESA, New York, 2008.
 
20
Darrell M. West. WMRC Global E-Government Survey. Taubman Center for Public Policy, Brown University, 2001.
 
21
Darrell M. West. Global E-Government. Center for Public Policy, Brown University, 2002.
 
22
Darrell M. West. Global E-Government. Center for Public Policy, Brown University, 2003.
 
23
Darrell M. West. Global E-Government. Center for Public Policy, Brown University, 2004.
 
24
Darrell M. West. Global E-Government. Center for Public Policy, Brown University, 2005.
 
25
Darrell M. West. Global E-Government. Center for Public Policy, Brown University, 2006.
 
26
Darrell M. West. Global E-Government. Center for Public Policy, Brown University, 2007.
 
27
WU-IEGOV. 2005 Waseda World e-Government Ranking. Waseda University Institute of e-Government, 2005.
 
28
WU-IEGOV. 2006 Waseda World e-Government Ranking. Waseda University Institute of e-Government, 2006.
 
29
WU-IEGOV. 2007 Waseda World e-Government Ranking. Waseda University Institute of e-Government, 2007.
 
30
WU-IEGOV. 2008 Waseda World e-Government Ranking. Waseda University Institute of e-Government, 2008.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mohamed Shareef: colleagues
Adegboyega Ojo: colleagues
Tomasz Janowski: colleagues