ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Goal-oriented service selection
Full text PdfPdf (380 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 351 archive
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance table of contents
Cairo, Egypt
TUTORIAL SESSION: Technology table of contents
Pages 60-66  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-386-0
Authors
Peter Salhofer  University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria
Gerald Tretter  University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria
Bernd Stadlhofer  University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria
FH Joanneum  University of Applied Sciences, Graz, Austria
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 71,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1509096.1509110
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Semantic technologies are going to be applied to almost all aspects of e-Government. Most of the approaches described so far deal with automatic web service discovery used by software agents. This paper focuses on the use of semantic technologies to support citizens when interacting with e-Government sites. Our experience has shown, that sometimes identifying the appropriate service that is needed to accomplish a tasks can require some in-depth knowledge of existing regulations. To overcome this potential barrier we suggest a relatively simple approach based on the use of ontologies to support citizens to select the correct administrative service. Our approach assists a citizen in formally expressing a goal that can in turn be used for service discovery. This is done by introducing some guidelines and constraints on the model; while this process can be simplified the complexity can be hidden from the user.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Berners-Lee, T., Semantic Web - XML2000, 2000. Accessed at http://www.w3.org/2000/Talks/1206-xml2k-tbl/slide10-0.html
2
 
3
Bloehdorn, S., Haase, P., Sure, Y. and Voelker, J., D.6.6.1 Report on the integration of ML, HLT and OM, 2005. Accessed at http://www.sti-innsbruck.at/fileadmin/documents/deliverables/Sekt/sekt-d-6-6-1-Int._ML___HLT___OM.pdf
4
5
 
6
de Bruijn, J., Holger Lausen H., Polleres A. and Fensel, D., The Web Service Modeling Language WSML: An Overview, in The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4011, Springer, 2006, pp590--604.
 
7
Fensel, D., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., Bruijn, J. d., Stollberg, M., Roman, D. and Domingue, J., Enabling Semantic Web Services: The Web Service Modeling Ontology, in Enabling Semantic Web Services: The Web Service Modeling Ontology, Springer, Secausus, NJ, 2007.
 
8
Gomez, J. M., Rico, M. and Sanchez, F. G., GODO: Goal Oriented Discovery for Semantic WebServices, 2006. Accessed at http://godo.atosorigin.es/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/godo_iswc06v2.pdf
9
 
10
Layne, K. and Lee, J., Developing Full Functional E-government: A Four Stage Model, in Government Information Quarterly, 2001, pp122--136.
 
11
Leitner, C (Ed.), eGovernment in Europe: The State of Affairs, 2003. Accessed at http://www.e-europeawards.org/view_extern.asp?id=4706
 
12
 
13
M. Ehrig and P. Haase and N. Stojanovic, Similarity for ontologies - a comprehensive framework, in In Workshop Enterprise Modelling and Ontology: Ingredients for Interoperability, at PAKM 2004, DEC 2004.
 
14
Martin D., Paolucci M., McIlraith S., Burstein M., McDermott D., McGuinness D., Parsia B., Payne T., Sabou M., Solanki M., Srinivasan N. and Sycara K., Bringing Semantics to Web Services:The OWL-S Approach, in Proceedings of the 1st Internation Workshop on Semantic Web Services and Web Process Composition, Springer, 2005, pp. 22--42.
 
15
 
16
Object Management Group, MDA Guide Version 1.0.1, 2003. Accessed at http://www.omg.org/docs/omg/03-06-01.pdf
 
17
OMG, Meta Object Facility (MOF) Specification, 2002. Accessed at http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/02-04-03.pdf
 
18
Polleres, A., Lara, R. and Dumitru, R, D4.2v01 Formal Comparison WSMO/OWL-S, 2004. Accessed at http://www.wsmo.org/2004/d4/d4.2/v0.1/20040315/
 
19
Schweighofer, E. and Rauber, A. and Dittenbach, M., International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, in Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law, ACM, 2001, pp78--87.
 
20
W3C, OWL Web Ontology Language Overview, 2004. Accessed at http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/
 
21

Collaborative Colleagues:
Peter Salhofer: colleagues
Gerald Tretter: colleagues
Bernd Stadlhofer: colleagues
FH Joanneum: colleagues