Using peer-led team learning to increase participation and success of under-represented groups in introductory computer science

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the implementation and evaluation of a program that uses active recruiting and peer-led team learning to try to increase the participation and success of women and minority students in undergraduate computer science. These strategies were applied at eight universities starting in the fall of 2004. There have been some impressive results:

• We succeeded in attracting under-represented students who would not otherwise have taken a CS course.
• Evaluation shows that participation in our program significantly improves retention rates and grades, especially for women.
• Students in the program, as well as the students who served as peer leaders, are uniformly enthusiastic about their experience.

REFERENCES

• 1: K. Acosta. Emerging scholars program-Computer science, Pilot semester - Fall semester 2004, A formative feedback report. Technical report, LEAD Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, March 2005.
• 2: J. K. Adair , M. A. Reyes , M. R. Anderson-Rowland , D. A. Kouris, Workshops vs. tutoring: how ASU's minority engineering program is changing the way engineering students learn, Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual, p.T4G-7-T4G-11vol.2, October 10-13, 2001
• 3: Donald Chinn , Kristofer Martin , Catherine Spencer, Treisman workshops and student performance in CS, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.39 n.1, March 2007
• 4: R. M. Felder and L. K. Silverman. Learning and teaching styles. Engr. Education, 78(7):674--681, 1988.
• 5: R. Fullilove and P. Treisman. Mathematics achievement among African-American undergraduates in the University of California, Berkeley: An evaluation of the mathematics workshop program. The Journal of Negro Education, 59(3):463--478, 1986.
• 6: D. Gosser, M. Cracolice, J. Kampmeier, V. Roth, V. Strozak, and P. Varma-Nelson, editors. Peer-Led Team Learning: A Guidebook. Prentice Hall, 2001.
• 7: KD Evaluation Consultants. Evaluation of the emerging scholars program in computer science 2005 - 2007. Technical report, KD Evaluation Consultants, August 2008.
• 8: S. Kosciuk. Impact of the Wisconsin Emerging Scholars first-semester calculus program. Technical report, LEAD Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, July 1997.
• 9: S. Millar, B. Alexander, H. Lewis, and J. Levin. Pilot Wisconsin Emerging Scholars Program: 1993-94. Technical report, LEAD Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, March 1995.
• 10: S. Moreno and C. Muller. Success and diversity: The transition through first-year calculus in the university. American Journal of Education, 108(1):30--57, November 1999.
• 11: M. Myers. The Emerging Scholars Program at UT Austin program evaluation 1988-1993. Technical report, Dana Center, University of Texas, Austin, 1994.
• 12: S. H. Rodger and S. Huss-Lederman. PLTL in CS website, 2007. www.pltlcs.org.
• 13: V. Roth, E. Goldstein, and G. Marcus. Peer-Led Team Learning: A Handbook for Team Leaders. Prentice Hall, 2001.
• 14: U. Treisman. Studying students studying calculus: A look at the lives of minority mathematics students in college. The College Mathematics Journal, 23(5):362--372, November 1992.
• 15: P. Varma-Nelson and L. Gafrey. What happens next? A follow-up study of workshop leaders at St. Xavier University. Workshop Project Newsletter, 3(2), Winter 2002.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
esp, inclusion, introductory computer science course, peer-led team learning, pltl, under-represented groups, women in computer science