Renaissance computing: an initiative for promoting student participation in computing

ABSTRACT

We report on a recently funded project called Renaissance Computing, an initiative for promoting student participation in computing. We propose a radical re-thinking not only of our core curriculum in CS, but of the role of CS at the university level. In our conception, ''computational thinking'' is neither easily separated from other endeavors nor easily balkanized into a single department. We thus imagine a CS curriculum that is inextricably linked to other domains. Our proposed initiative covers introductory, depth, and capstone courses, targeting both CS majors and minors. It is also aimed to develop interdisciplinary CS courses in sciences, engineering, arts, and humanities. Furthermore, the framework embraces collaborative learning to help improve learning.

REFERENCES

• 1: ADL, Advanced Distributed Learning. (2003). DoD affirms SCORM's role in training transformation. Retrieved July 18, 2005, from www.adlnet.org
• 2: Alexander, B. (2006). Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning?, EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 32--44.
• 3: ASTD. (2000). A Primer on Learning Objects. Learning circuits: ASTD's online magazine about E-learning. http://learning circuits.org/mar2000/primer.html
• 4: Boster, F. J., Meyer, G. S., Roberto, A. J., & Inge, C. C. (2002). A report on the effect of the UnitedStreaming Application on educational performance. Cometrika/United Learning.
• 5: Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-Scripting CSCL: The Risks of Blending Collaborative Learning with Instructional Design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (pp. 61--91). Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
• 6: Francia, G. (2003). A Tale of Two Learning Objects. J. of Educational Technology Systems, 3, 177--190.
• 7: Grunwald Associates. (2002). Video and television use among K-12 teachers. Survey results in Power Point format prepared for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB).
• 8: Mark Guzdial, Education; Paving the way for computational thinking, Communications of the ACM, v.51 n.8, August 2008 [doi>10.1145/1378704.1378713]
• 9: Hansen, T., L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, R. Lewis, & J. Rogelj (1999). Using Telematics for Collaborative Knowledge Construction, Chapter 9, in P. Dillenbourg (ed.) Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 169--195.
• 10: Hartman, J. L., C. Dziuban, & J. Brophy-Ellison (2007). Faculty 2.0, EDUCAUSE Review, 42(5), 62--77.
• 11: Howe, C., A. Tolmie, A. Anderson, & M. Mackenzie (1992). Conceptual Knowledge in Physics: The Role of Group Interaction in Computer-Supported Teaching, Learning and Instruction, 2(3), 161--183.
• 12: Khandaker, N., L.-K. Soh, & H. Jiang (2006). Student Learning and Team Formation in a Structured CSCL Environment, Proc. ICCE'2006 (pp. 185--192), Beijing, China.
• 13: Koppi, T., & Lavitt, N. (2003). Institutional use of learning objects three years on: Lessons learned and future direction. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~erikd/PRES/2003/LO2003/
• 14: Kreijns, K., P. A. Kirschner, & W. Jochyems (2003). Identifying the Pitfalls for Social Interaction in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments: A Review of the Research, Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 335--353.
• 15: Lehtinen, E., K. Harkkarainen, L. Lipponen, M. Rahikainen, & H. Muukkonen (2001). Computer Supported Collaborative Learning: A Review. Retrieved March 5, 2008, from http://www.comlab.hut.fi/opetus/205/etatehtava1.pdf
• 16: Janet Macdonald, Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product, Computers & Education, v.40 n.4, p.377-391, May 2003 [doi>10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00168-9]
• 17: Nugent, G., L.-K. Soh, & A. Samal (2006a). Design, Development and Validation of Learning Objects, J. Educational Technology Systems, 34(3), 271--281.
• 18: Pasnik, S., & Keisch, D. (2003). Teachers' Domain Evaluation Report, NY: Center for Children and Technology. Retrieved October 10, 2004, from http://www2.edc.org/CCT/publications_report_summary.asp?numPubId=148
• 19: Shell, D. F.,J. Husman, J. E. Turner, D. M. Cliffel, U. Nath, & N. Sweany (2005). The Impact of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Communities on High School Students' Knowledge Building, Strategic Learning, and Perceptions of the Classroom, J. Educational Computing Research, 33(3), 327--349.
• 20: Leen-Kiat Soh , Hong Jiang , Charles Ansorge, Agent-based cooperative learning: a proof-of-concept experiment, Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 03-07, 2004, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
• 21: Leen-Kiat Soh , Nobel Khandaker , Hong Jiang, I-MINDS: A Multiagent System for Intelligent Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning and Classroom Management, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, v.18 n.2, p.119-151, April 2008
• 22: Soh, L.-K., N. Khandaker, and H. Jiang (2006). Multiagent Coalition Formation for Computer-Supported Cooperative Learning Proc. IAAI'2006 (pp.1844--1851), Boston, MA.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Curriculum

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors, Measurement

Keywords:
capstone, initiative, interdisciplinary, introductory