Successful and unsuccessful problem solving approaches of novice programmers

ABSTRACT

Learning to program continues to be challenging for many students. This paper reports on problem-solving approaches undertaken by pair programming students. We examine reasons why some approaches lead to success while others lead to failure. We also identify some aspects of the Java language that appear to lead to student misconceptions. Finally, we provide suggestions for educators interested in helping students learn successful approaches and avoid unsuccessful ones.

REFERENCES

• 1: David J. Barnes , Michael Kolling, Objects First With Java: A Practical Introduction Using BlueJ (3rd Edition), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2006
• 2: Brandon Carlson, An Agile Classroom Experience: Teaching TDD and Refactoring, Proceedings of the Agile 2008, p.465-469, August 04-08, 2008 [doi>10.1109/Agile.2008.39]
• 3: Brian Hanks, Empirical evaluation of distributed pair programming, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.66 n.7, p.530-544, July, 2008 [doi>10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.10.003]
• 4: Raymond Lister , Elizabeth S. Adams , Sue Fitzgerald , William Fone , John Hamer , Morten Lindholm , Robert McCartney , Jan Erik Moström , Kate Sanders , Otto Seppälä , Beth Simon , Lynda Thomas, A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in novice programmers, Working group reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 28-30, 2004, Leeds, United Kingdom
• 5: Will Marrero , Amber Settle, Testing first: emphasizing testing in early programming courses, Proceedings of the 10th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, June 27-29, 2005, Caparica, Portugal
• 6: Michael McCracken , Vicki Almstrum , Danny Diaz , Mark Guzdial , Dianne Hagan , Yifat Ben-David Kolikant , Cary Laxer , Lynda Thomas , Ian Utting , Tadeusz Wilusz, A multi-national, multi-institutional study of assessment of programming skills of first-year CS students, Working group reports from ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education, December 01, 2001, Canterbury, UK [doi>10.1145/572133.572137]
• 7: Charlie McDowell , Linda Werner , Heather E. Bullock , Julian Fernald, Pair programming improves student retention, confidence, and program quality, Communications of the ACM, v.49 n.8, p.90-95, August 2006 [doi>10.1145/1145287.1145293]
• 8: Laurie Murphy , Gary Lewandowski , Renée McCauley , Beth Simon , Lynda Thomas , Carol Zander, Debugging: the good, the bad, and the quirky -- a qualitative analysis of novices' strategies, Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, March 12-15, 2008, Portland, OR, USA
• 9: D. N. Perkins , Fay Martin, Fragile knowledge and neglected strategies in novice programmers, Papers presented at the first workshop on empirical studies of programmers on Empirical studies of programmers, p.213-229, June 1986, Washington, D.C., United States
• 10: Tristan Richardson , Quentin Stafford-Fraser , Kenneth R. Wood , Andy Hopper, Virtual Network Computing, IEEE Internet Computing, v.2 n.1, p.33-38, January 1998 [doi>10.1109/4236.656066]
• 11: Carol A. Wellington , Thomas H. Briggs , C. Dudley Girard, Experiences Using Automated 4ests and 4est Driven Development in Computer 9cience I, Proceedings of the AGILE 2007, p.106-112, August 13-17, 2007 [doi>10.1109/AGILE.2007.27]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Computer science education

General Terms:
Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
distributed pair programming, introductory programming, java, novice, pair programming, problem solving approaches