ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Robust approximate aggregation in sensor data management systems
Full text PdfPdf (695 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS) archive
Volume 34 ,  Issue 1  (April 2009) table of contents
Article No. 6  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:0362-5915
Authors
Jeffrey Considine  Boston University, Boston, MA
Marios Hadjieleftheriou  AT&T Labs, Florham Park, NJ
Feifei Li  Boston University, Boston, MA
John Byers  Boston University, Boston, MA
George Kollios  Boston University, Boston, MA
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 41,   Downloads (12 Months): 191,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1508857.1508863
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In the emerging area of sensor-based systems, a significant challenge is to develop scalable, fault-tolerant methods to extract useful information from the data the sensors collect. An approach to this data management problem is the use of sensor database systems, which allow users to perform aggregation queries such as MIN, COUNT, and AVG on the readings of a sensor network. In addition, more advanced queries such as frequency counting and quantile estimation can be supported. Due to energy limitations in sensor-based networks, centralized data collection is generally impractical, so most systems use in-network aggregation to reduce network traffic. However, even these aggregation strategies remain bandwidth-intensive when combined with the fault-tolerant, multipath routing methods often used in these environments. To avoid this expense, we investigate the use of approximate in-network aggregation using small sketches. We present duplicate-insensitive sketching techniques that can be implemented efficiently on small sensor devices with limited hardware support and we analyze both their performance and accuracy. Finally, we present an experimental evaluation that validates the effectiveness of our methods.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
 
4
Bawa, M., Garcia-Molina, H., Gionis, A., and Motwani, R. 2003. Estimating aggregates on a peer-to-peer network. Tech. rep., Stanford University.
 
5
Chakrabarti, D., Leskovec, J., Faloutsos, C., Madden, S., Guestrin, C., and Faloutsos, M. 2007. Information survival threshold in sensor and p2p networks. In Proceedings of the Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (InfoCom'07), 1316--1324.
 
6
 
7
 
8
9
10
 
11
Deligiannakis, A., Kotidis, Y., and Roussopoulos, N. 2004b. Hierarchical in-network data aggregation with quality guarantees. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT'04), 658--675.
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
Devroye, L. 1986. Non-Uniform Random Variate Generation. Springer.
 
16
Durand, M. and Flajolet, P. 2003. Loglog counting of large cardinalities. In Proceedings of the European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA'03), 605--617.
 
17
 
18
19
20
21
 
22
Garofalakis, M., Hellerstein, J. M., and Maniatis, P. 2007. Proof sketches: Verifiable in- network aggregation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'07), 996--1005.
23
 
24
25
 
26
Horton, M., Culler, D., Pister, K., Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., and Woo, A. 2002. Mica, the commercialization of microsensor motes. IEEE Sensors J. 19, 4, 40--48.
 
27
28
 
29
 
30
31
32
33
34
 
35
Munro, J. I. and Paterson, M. 1980. Selection and sorting with limited storage. Theor. Comput. Sci. 12, 315--323.
36
37
 
38
Papoulis, A. 1965. Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes. McGraw-Hill, New York.
39
 
40
41
 
42
Stoev, S., Hadjieleftheriou, M., Kollios, G., and Taqqu, M. S. 2007. Norm, point, and distance estimation over multiple signals using max-stable distributions. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE'07), 1006--1015.
 
43
U.S. Census Bureau. 2009.TIGER/Line datasets. http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/.
44
45
 
46
Yao, Y. and Gehrke, J. 2003. Query processing in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the Biennial Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research (CIDR'03).
 
47
 
48
Zhao, J., Govindan, R., and Estrin, D. 2003. Computing aggregates for monitoring wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications (SNPA'03),139--148.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jeffrey Considine: colleagues
Marios Hadjieleftheriou: colleagues
Feifei Li: colleagues
John Byers: colleagues
George Kollios: colleagues