ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
SEA: Segment-enrich-annotate paradigm for adapting dialog-based content for improved accessibility
Full text PdfPdf (4.31 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 27 ,  Issue 3  (May 2009) table of contents
Article No. 15  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1046-8188
Authors
K. Selçuk Candan  Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Mehmet E. Dönderler  Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Terri Hedgpeth  Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Jong Wook Kim  Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Qing Li  Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ
Maria Luisa Sapino  Università di Torino, Torino, Italy
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 42,   Downloads (12 Months): 189,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1508850.1508853
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

While navigation within complex information spaces is a problem for all users, the problem is most evident with individuals who are blind who cannot simply locate, point, and click on a link in hypertext documents with a mouse. Users who are blind have to listen searching for the link in the document using only the keyboard and a screen reader program, which may be particularly inefficient in large documents with many links or deep hierarchies that are hard to navigate. Consequently, they are especially penalized when the information being searched is hidden under multiple layers of indirections. In this article, we introduce a segment-enrich-annotate (SEA) paradigm for adapting digital content with deep structures for improved accessibility. In particular, we instantiate and evaluate this paradigm through the iCare-Assistant, an assistive system for helping students who are blind in accessing Web and electronic course materials. Our evaluations, involving the participation of students who are blind, showed that the iCare-Assistant system, built based on the SEA paradigm, reduces the navigational overhead significantly and enables user who are blind access complex online course servers effectively.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Antonelli, F., Kim, J. W., Candan, K. S., and Sapino, M. L. 2005. Navigation support for students who are blind in accessing discussion boards. In Proceedings of the ACM International Workshop on Combining Intelligent and Adaptive Hypermedia Methods/Techniques in Web-Based Education Systems. Associated with ACM Hypertext 2005.
 
3
Arguello, J. and Rose, C. 2006. Topic segmentation of dialogue. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL 2006 Workshop on Analyzing Conversations in Text and Speech.
 
4
Armstrong, R., Freitag, D., Joachims, T., and Mitchell, T. 1995. Webwatcher: A learning apprentice for the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Information Gathering. 6--12.
 
5
Balananovic, M. and Shoham, Y. 1995. Learning information retrieval agents: Experiments with automated Web browsing. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Information Gathering from Heterogeneous, Distributed Environments.
 
6
7
 
8
9
 
10
Bloedhorn, E., Mani, I., and MacMillan, T. R. 1996. Representational issues in machine learning of user profiles. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Learning in Information Access.
 
11
Boreczk, J. S. and Rowe, L. A. 1996. Comparison of video shot boundary detection techniques. In Proceedings of the SPIE/IS&T International Symposium Electronic Imaging. Vol. 2664. 170--179.
 
12
Bourne, J., Harris, D., and Mayadas, F. 2005. Online engineering education: Learning anywhere, anytime. J. Eng. Educat. 94, 1 (Jan), 131--146.
 
13
Brajnik, G., Guida, G., and Tasso, C. 1990. User modeling in man-machine interfaces: A case study in intelligent information retrieval. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 20, 1, 166--185.
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
Candan, K. S., Kim, J. W., Liu, H., and Suvarna, R. 2004. Structure-based mining of hierarchical media data, meta-data, and ontologies. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining in Conjunction with the ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (Seattle, WA).
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
Cannataro, M., Cuzzocrea, A., and Pugliese, A. 2001. A probabilistic approach to model adaptive hypermedia systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International conference on Web Dynamics (London, UK). 12--30. In conjunction with the 8th International Conference on Database Theory.
 
25
Caracciolo, C., van Hage, W., and de Rijke, M. 2004. Towards topic driven access to full text documents. In Proceedings of the European Digital Library Conferences.
 
26
27
 
28
Cavanaugh, T. 2002. The need for assistive technology in educational technology. Educat. Tech. Rev. 10, 1, 27--31.
 
29
30
31
 
32
 
33
Choi, F. 2000b. Linear text segmentation. In Proceedings of CLUK3.
 
34
Choi, F. Y. Y., Wiemer-Hastings, P., and Moore, J. 2001. Latent semantic analysis for text segmentation. In Proceedings of EMNLP.
 
35
Danino, N. and MacFarlane, S. 2002. Making the World Wide Web more accessible. In Proceedings of the 1st Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology (CWUAAT).
 
36
Danino, N. and Nicholson, I. 2001. Specifying Internet accessibility requirements. In Proceedings of the Ethics, ICT and Social Exclusion Conference.
 
37
 
38
Deubel, P. 2003. An investigation of behaviorist and cognitive approaches to instructional multimedia design. J. Educat. Multimed. Hypermed.
 
39
Donderler, M. E., Candan, K. S., Wu, S., Peng, L., and Kim, J. W. 2004. Adaptive electronic course content delivery for students who are blind. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS04). Demonstration.
 
40
Donderler, M. E., Peng, L., and Candan, K. S. 2003. Adaptive content delivery to assist blind students in accessing course materials. In Proceedings of the 6th Annual Accessing Higher Ground Conference: Assistive Technology and Accessible Media in Higher Education (Boulder, CO).
41
 
42
Faraway, J. 2002. Practical Regression and Anova using R. http://www.stat.lsa.umich.edu/~faraway/book.
 
43
Feng, D., Kim, J., Shaw, E., and Hovy, E. 2006. Towards modeling threaded discussions through ontology-based analysis. In Proceedings of the Conference of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI).
 
44
Fink, J., Kobsa, A., and Nill, A. 1996. User oriented adaptivity and adaptability in the AVANTI project. In Designing for the Web: Empirial Studies: Microsoft Usability Group, Redmond, WA.
 
45
 
46
Gerber, E. and Kirchner, C. 2001. Who's surfing? internet access and computer use by visually impaired youths and adults. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 95, 3, 176--181.
 
47
Gold, D. 2001. A constructivist approach to online training for online teachers. J. Asynchron. Learn. Netw. 5, 1, 35--57.
 
48
Grant, S. 1994. Modeling complex cognition: Contextual modularity and transitions. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on User Modeling (Hyannis, MA). 157--162.
 
49
Haag, M. and Tonn, W. 1997. Sampling, density estimation and spatial relations. In Tested Studies for Laboratory Teaching (ABLE Proceedings) 19, 197--215.
 
50
 
51
 
52
Hatzilygeroudis, I. and Prentzas, J. 2004. Using a hybrid rule-based approach in developing an intelligent tutoring system with knowledge acquisition and update capabilities. J. Expert Syst. Appl. 26, 4, 477--492.
 
53
 
54
 
55
Hollan, J. D. 1990. User models and user interfaces: A case for domain models, task models, and tailorability. In Proceedings of AAAI-90, 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1137.
 
56
Hoz, R. and Asnat, A. 2001. The tactics and knowledge representations used by blind students in learning from texts. J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 95, 5, 304--307.
57
 
58
Jones, M., Farquhar, J., and Surry, D. 1995. Using metacognitive theories to design user interfaces for computer-based learning. Educat. Tech. 35, 4, 12--22.
 
59
60
61
 
62
Kim, J. W. and Candan, K. S. 2006. Keyword weight propagation for indexing structured Web. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Web Mining and Web Usage Analysis (WebKDD).
63
64
 
65
Krulwich, B. and Burkey, C. 1996. Learning user information interests through the extraction of semantically significant phrases. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Learning in Information Access.
 
66
Kwok, K., Deng, P., Dinstl, N., and Chan, M. 2002. Trec 2002 Web, novelty and filtering track experiments using PIRCS. In Proceedings of TREC.
 
67
Lang, K. 1995. NewsWeeder: Learning to filter netnews. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML, San Francisco, CA). 3311--3319.
 
68
69
 
70
Li, W.-S., Candan, K. S., Vu, Q., and Agrawal, D. 2001b. Query relaxation by structure and semantics for retrieval of logical Web documents. Proceedings of IEEE TKDE.
71
 
72
Lieberman, H. 1995. Letizia: An agent that assists Web browsing. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95), C. S. Mellish, Ed. (Montreal, P/Q., Canada). 924--929.
73
 
74
 
75
Markoulis, D. 1988. Moral and cognitive reasoning features incongenitally blind children: Comparisons with the sighted. Brit. J. Develop. Psych. 6, 59--69.
 
76
 
77
Mythili, S. and Padmapriya, B. 1987. Paired associate learning with auditory and visual imagery among blind, deaf, and normal children. J. Indian Acad. Appl. Psych. 13, 48--56.
 
78
Park, I. and Hannafin, M. 1993. Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia. Educat. Techn. Res. Develope. 41, 3(Sept.), 63--85.
 
79
Pazzani, M., Maramatsu, J., and Billsus, D. 1996. Syskill & Webert: Identifying interesting Web sites. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Machine Learning in Information Access.
80
81
82
83
 
84
Reusen, A. V. and Head, D. 1994. Cognitive and metacognitive interventions: Important trends for teachers of students who are visually impaired. Re:View 25, 153--162.
 
85
 
86
Richardson, J. and Swan, K. 2003. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. J. Asynchron. Learn. Netw. 7, 1, 68--88.
 
87
Sapino, M., Candan, K., Kim, J., and Antonelli, F. 2007. Annotating educational discussion boards to help students who are blind. Int. J. Contin. Educat. Life-Long Learn. To appear.
 
88
 
89
Shakery, A. and Zhai, C. 2003. Relevance propagation for topic distillation UIUC TREC-2003 Web track experiments. In Proceedings of TREC.
 
90
 
91
 
92
Song, R., Wen, J., Shi, S., Xin, G., Liu, T., T.Qin, Zheng, X., Zhang, J., Xue, G., and Ma, W. 2004. Microsoft Research Asia at Web track and terabyte track of TREC. In Proceedings of the TREC.
 
93
94
 
95
Tsai, M.-F. and Chen, H.-H. 2002. Some similarity computation methods in novelty detection. In Proceedings of TREC.
 
96
 
97
Waddell, C. D. 1999. Electronic curbcuts: Universal access for everyone. iMP Magazine. http://www.cisp.org/imp/december_99/12_99waddell.htm.
 
98
Winn, W. and Snyder, S. 1996. Cognitive perspectives in psychology. In Handbook for Research for Educational Communications and Technology. Simon & Schuster MacMillan, New York, NY.
99
 
100
101


Collaborative Colleagues:
K. Selçuk Candan: colleagues
Mehmet E. Dönderler: colleagues
Terri Hedgpeth: colleagues
Jong Wook Kim: colleagues
Qing Li: colleagues
Maria Luisa Sapino: colleagues