|
ABSTRACT
Recent technological advances in the development of flash-memory based devices have consolidated their leadership position as the preferred storage media in the embedded systems market and opened new vistas for deployment in enterprise-scale storage systems. Unlike hard disks, flash devices are free from any mechanical moving parts, have no seek or rotational delays and consume lower power. However, the internal idiosyncrasies of flash technology make its performance highly dependent on workload characteristics. The poor performance of random writes has been a cause of major concern, which needs to be addressed to better utilize the potential of flash in enterprise-scale environments. We examine one of the important causes of this poor performance: the design of the Flash Translation Layer (FTL), which performs the virtual-to-physical address translations and hides the erase-before-write characteristics of flash. We propose a complete paradigm shift in the design of the core FTL engine from the existing techniques with our Demand-based Flash Translation Layer (DFTL), which selectively caches page-level address mappings. We develop a flash simulation framework called FlashSim. Our experimental evaluation with realistic enterprise-scale workloads endorses the utility of DFTL in enterprise-scale storage systems by demonstrating: (i) improved performance, (ii) reduced garbage collection overhead and (iii) better overload behavior compared to state-of-the-art FTL schemes. For example, a predominantly random-write dominant I/O trace from an OLTP application running at a large financial institution shows a 78% improvement in average response time (due to a 3-fold reduction in operations of the garbage collector), compared to a state-of-the-art FTL scheme. Even for the well-known read-dominant TPC-H benchmark, for which DFTL introduces additional overheads, we improve system response time by 56%.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Amir Ban. Flash File System. In United States Patent, No 5,404,485, 1993.
|
| |
2
|
T. Chung, D. Park, S. Park, D. Lee, S. Lee, and H. Song. System Software for Flash Memory: A Survey. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, pages 394--404, August 2006.
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Flash Drives Hit by High Failure Rates. Flash Drives Hit by High Failure Rates. http://www.techworld.com/storage/news/index.cfm?newsid=11747.
|
| |
5
|
G.R. Ganger, B.L. Worthington, and Y.N. Patt. The DiskSim Simulation Environment Version 3.0 Reference Manual.
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
A. Gupta, Y. Kim, and B. Urgaonkar. DFTL: A Flash Translation Layer Employing Demand-based Selective Caching of Page-level Address Mappings. In Technical Report CSE 08-012, Penn State University, August 2008.
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
HP Labs. Tools and Traces. HP Labs. Tools and Traces. http://tesla.hpl.hp.com/public_software/.
|
| |
11
|
J. Kim, J.M. Kim, S.H. Noh, S. Min, and Y. Cho. A Space-Efficient Flash Translation Layer for Compactflash Systems. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 48(2):366--375, 2002.
|
 |
12
|
Dawoon Jung , Yoon-Hee Chae , Heeseung Jo , Jin-Soo Kim , Joonwon Lee, A group-based wear-leveling algorithm for large-capacity flash memory storage systems, Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Compilers, architecture, and synthesis for embedded systems, September 30-October 03, 2007, Salzburg, Austria
[doi> 10.1145/1289881.1289911]
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
Y. Kim, S. Gurumurthi, and A. Sivasubramaniam. Understanding the Performance-Temperature Interactions in Disk I/O of Server Workloads. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA), Febuary 2006.
|
 |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
Sang-Won Lee , Dong-Joo Park , Tae-Sun Chung , Dong-Ho Lee , Sangwon Park , Ha-Joo Song, A log buffer-based flash translation layer using fully-associative sector translation, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems (TECS), v.6 n.3, p.18-es, July 2007
[doi> 10.1145/1275986.1275990]
|
| |
20
|
S. Lee, D. Shin, Y. Kim, and J. Kim. LAST: Locality-Aware Sector Translation for NAND Flash Memory-Based Storage Systems. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Storage and I/O Virtualization, Performance, Energy, Evaluation and Dependability (SPEED2008), Feburary 2008.
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
K. M. J. Lofgren, R. D. Norman, G B. Thelin, and A. Gupta. Wear Leveling Techniques for Flash EEPROM. In United States Patent, No 6,850,443, 2005.
|
| |
23
|
Micron 16GB Mass Storage. Micron 16GB Mass Storage. http://www.micron.com/products/partdetail?part=MT29F16G08DAAWP.
|
| |
24
|
Micron Technical Report (TN-29-07): Small-Block vs. Large-Block NAND Flash Devices. Technical Report (TN-29-07): Small-Block vs. Large-Block NAND Flash Devices. http://www.micron.com/products/nand/technotes.
|
| |
25
|
OLTP Trace from UMass Trace Repository. OLTP Trace from UMass Trace Repository. http://traces.cs.umass.edu/index.php/Storage/Storage.
|
| |
26
|
Websearch Trace from UMass Trace Repository. Websearch Trace from UMass Trace Repository. http://traces. cs.umass.edu/index.php/Storage/Storage.
|
| |
27
|
White Paper: Datacenter SSDs: Solid Footing for Growth. White Paper: Datacenter SSDs: Solid Footing for Growth. http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/products/flash/FlashApplicationNote.html.
|
| |
28
|
Jianyong Zhang , Anand Sivasubramaniam , Hubertus Franke , Natarajan Gautam , Yanyong Zhang , Shailabh Nagar, Synthesizing Representative I/O Workloads for TPC-H, Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on High Performance Computer Architecture, p.142, February 14-18, 2004
[doi> 10.1109/HPCA.2004.10019]
|
|