ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analytic tableaux calculi for KLM logics of nonmonotonic reasoning
Full text PdfPdf (719 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic (TOCL) archive
Volume 10 ,  Issue 3  (April 2009) table of contents
Article No. 18  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:1529-3785
Authors
Laura Giordano  Università del Piemonte Orientale “A. Avogadro”, Alessandria, Italy
Valentina Gliozzi  Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
Nicola Olivetti  Université Paul Cézanne, Marseille, France
Gian Luca Pozzato  Università degli Studi di Torino, Turin, Italy
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 82,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

appendices and supplements   abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1507244.1507248
What is a DOI?

APPENDICES and SUPPLEMENTS
Online appendix to analytic tableaux calculi for KLM logics of nonmonotonic reasoning. The appendix supports the information on article 18.


ABSTRACT

We present tableau calculi for the logics of nonmonotonic reasoning defined by Kraus, Lehmann and Magidor (KLM). We give a tableau proof procedure for all KLM logics, namely preferential, loop-cumulative, cumulative, and rational logics. Our calculi are obtained by introducing suitable modalities to interpret conditional assertions. We provide a decision procedure for the logics considered and we study their complexity.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Arieli, O. and Avron, A. 2000. General patterns for nonmonotonic reasoning: From basic entailments to plausible relations. Logic J. IGPL 8, 2, 119--148.
 
2
Artosi, A., Governatori, G., and Rotolo, A. 2002. Labelled tableaux for non-monotonic reasoning: Cumulative consequence relations. J. Logic Comput. 12, 6, 1027--1060.
 
3
 
4
Beckert, B. and Posegga, J. 1995. leantap: Lean tableau-based deduction. J. Automated Reasoning 15, 3, 339--358.
 
5
Beckert, B. and Posegga, J. 1996. Logic programming as a basis for lean automated deduction. J. Logic Program. 28, 3, 231--236.
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
Crocco, G. and Lamarre, P. 1992. On the connection between non-monotonic inference systems and conditional logics. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, B. Nebel and E. Sandewall, Eds., 565--571.
 
10
11
 
12
Fitting, M. 1998. leantap revisited. J. Logic Comput. 8, 1, 33--47.
13
14
 
15
 
16
Gardenförs, P. 1988. Knowledge in Flux. MIT Press.
 
17
Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., and Pozzato, G. L. 2005a. Analytic tableaux for KLM preferential and cumulative logics. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning, G. Sutcliffe and A. Voronkov, Eds. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3835. Springer, 666--681.
 
18
Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., and Pozzato, G. L. 2006. Analytic tableaux calculi for KLM rational logic R. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, M. Fisher et al., Eds. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 4160. Springer, 190--202.
 
19
Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., and Pozzato, G. L. 2007a. Tableau calculi for klm logics: extended version. Tech. Rep. 102/07, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Torino. http://www.di.unito.it/~argo/papers/RT_10207.pdf.
 
20
Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., and Schwind, C. 2003. Tableau calculi for preference-based conditional logics. In Proceedings of the Conference on Automated Reasoning with Analytic Tableaux and Related Methods, M. Cialdea Meyer and F. Pirri, Eds. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2796. Springer, 81--101.
 
21
Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., and Schwind, C. 2005b. Extensions of tableau calculi for preference-based conditional logics. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Methods for Modalities (M4M-4), H. Schlingloff, Ed. Informatik-Bericht 194, Fraunhofer Institute FIRST, Berlin, 220--234.
 
22
 
23
 
24
Hughes, G. and Cresswell, M. 1984. A Companion to Modal Logic. Methuen.
 
25
Katsuno, H. and Sato, K. 1991. A unified view of consequence relation, belief revision and conditional logic. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI'91), 406--412.
 
26
 
27
 
28
Makinson, D. 2003. Bridges between classical and nonmonotonic logic. Logic J. IGPL 11, 1, 69--96.
 
29
Makinson, D. 2005. Bridges from Classical to Nonmonotonic Logic. Series: Texts in Computing, vol 5. King's College Publications, London.
 
30
Olivetti, N. and Pozzato, G. L. 2005. KLMLean 1.0: A theorem prover for logics of default reasoning. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Methods for Modalities (M4M-4), H. Schlingloff, Ed. Informatik-Bericht 194, Fraunhofer Institute FIRST, Berlin, 235--245.
 
31
 
32
Pozzato, G. L. 2007. Proof methods for conditional and preferential logics. Ph.D. thesis, Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Torino. http://www.di.unito.it/~argo/papers/2007_PhDpozzato.pdf.
 
33
Shoham, Y. 1987. A semantical approach to nonmonotonic logics. In Proceedings of the Conference on Logics in Computer Science, 275--279.
 
34

Collaborative Colleagues:
Laura Giordano: colleagues
Valentina Gliozzi: colleagues
Nicola Olivetti: colleagues
Gian Luca Pozzato: colleagues