ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Categorizing web queries
Full text PdfPdf (555 KB)
Source
ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes archive
Volume 34 ,  Issue 2  (March 2009) table of contents
SECTION: Article abstracts with full text online table of contents
Pages 1-4  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISSN:0163-5948
Authors
Stephen Nelson  University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR
Coşkun Bayrak  University of Arkansas at Little Rock, Little Rock, AR
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 87,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1507195.1507210
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Over the past ten years, the user base for the World Wide Web (WWW) has grown over 400% [1]. This increased user base has naturally led to an enormous amount of data available for users to search. Corporations, such as Google, often store user search records and there are many concerns, as well as positive aspects, for how search records may be used. One aspect in particular, categorizing web queries, presents several challenges. This paper will discuss the challenging aspects of categorizing web queries, review previous categorical research, and conclude with a method for tackling one of the challenging aspects.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
"Internet Penetration and Impact," http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/182/report_display.asp, April 26, 2006.
 
2
"CNBC Special Report: Big Brother, Big Business - Technology is being used to monitor Americans more than ever before," http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15519811, November 6, 2006.
 
3
"Murder in the moonlight", http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14738060/page/3/, September 8, 2006.
4
 
5
"AOL search data mirrors", http://www.gregsadetsky.com/aol-data/
 
6
"Click Through Rate of Google Search Results - AOL-data.tgz - Want to Know How Many Clicks The #1 Google Position Gets?", http://www.redcardinal.ie/search-engine-optimisation/12-08-2006/clickthrough-analysis-of-aol-datatgz/
 
7
"Leaked AOL data: the importance of top search engine rankings", http://www.free-seo-news.com/newsletter226.htm
 
8
"AOL Proudly Releases Massive Amounts of Private Data", http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/06/aol-proudly-releases-massive-amounts-of-user-search-data/
 
9
"AOL Gate: Search Query Data Scandal", http://elliottback.com/wp/archives/2006/08/07/aol-gate-search-query-data-scandal/
 
10
"KDD Cup 2005", http://www.sigkdd.org/kdd2005/kddcup.html
 
11
"ODP -- Open Directory Project", http://www.dmoz.org
 
12
"The world's most popular open source database", http://www.mysql.com/
 
13
"The Apache Software Foundation", www.apache.org/
 
14
"ActiveState - ActivePerl - The complete and ready-to-install Perl distribution. - Dynamic Tools for Dynamic Languages", www.activestate.com/ActivePerl/
 
15
"DBD::mysql - MySQL driver for the Perl5 Database Inter-face (DBI)", http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBD-mysql/lib/DBD/mysql.pm

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stephen Nelson: colleagues
Coşkun Bayrak: colleagues