|
ABSTRACT
Wireless sensor networks have been widely applied to many fields including industry, science and environment monitoring. A typical wireless sensor network comprises distributed sensors and a sink. The sink gathers and analyzes the data from distributed sensors and then takes the corresponding action accordingly. Such an architecture is vulnerable to a single-point of failure problem. In addition, when sensors do not have a direct link with the sink, they must deliver data by hopping through other sensors. The sink may take a longer time to collect data. Furthermore, some faulty sensors may cause an incorrect result. To overcome the single-point of failure problem and the unexpected sensor faultiness in a traditional wireless sensor network, we propose a consensus problem algorithm which is applied to an autonomous local wireless sensor network without a centralized sink. Since there is no need to send the detected value from distributed sensors to a central sink, our scheme can conduct a quick and direct action taking. Additionally, distributed computing in such an autonomous local wireless sensor network can endure limited faulty sensors and environment interference.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Amotz Bar-Noy , Danny Dolev , Cynthia Dwork , H. Raymond Strong, Shifting gears: changing algorithms on the fly to expedite Byzantine agreement, Proceedings of the sixth annual ACM Symposium on Principles of distributed computing, p.42-51, August 10-12, 1987, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
[doi> 10.1145/41840.41844]
|
| |
2
|
A. Gopakumar, and L. Jacob, "Localization in Wireless Sensor Networks using Particle Swarm Optimization," Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, 2008. IET International Conference on, pp. 227-230, 2008.
|
| |
3
|
Bekmezci, Ilker Alagoz, Fatih, "Energy Efficient, Delay Sensitive, Fault Tolerant Wireless Sensor Network for Military Monitoring," Sensors Applications Symposium, SAS 2008. IEEE, pp. 172-177, 2008.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
G. Wang, W. Zhang, G. Cao, and T. La Porta, "On Supporting Distributed Collaboration in Sensor Network," in Proc. of IEEE Military Commun. Conf., Oct, 2003, vol. 2, pp. 752-757.
|
| |
6
|
I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, "A survey on Sensor Networks," IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 102-114, Aug. 2002.
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
M. Fischer, and N. Lynch, "A Lower Bound for the Assure Interactive Consistency," Informatino Processing Letters, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 183-186, 1982.
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
S. A. Aldosari, and J. M. F. Moura, "Detection in Sensor Networks: The Saddlepoint Approximation," IEEE Transaction on Signal Processing, vol. 55, issue 1, pp. 327- 340, 2007.
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
S.C. Wang, S.C. Yang, K.Q. Yan, "Consensus in a Dual Fallible Scale Free Network," in the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Hong Kong, March 11-15, 2007.
|
| |
15
|
V. Chatzigiannakis, and S. Papavassiliou, "Diagnosing Anomalies and Identifying Faulty Nodes in Sensor Networks," IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 637-645, 2007.
|
|