| Consistency checking of role assignments in inter-organizational collaboration |
| Full text |
Pdf
(512 KB)
|
Source
|
Geographic Information Systems
archive
Proceedings of the SIGSPATIAL ACM GIS 2008 International Workshop on Security and Privacy in GIS and LBS
table of contents
Irvine, California
SESSION: Policies
table of contents
Pages 82-88
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-324-2
|
|
Authors
|
|
Paul El Khoury
|
University Claude Bernard Lyon, LIRIS CNRS, Mougins - France
|
|
Emmanuel Coquery
|
University Claude Bernard Lyon, LIRIS CNRS, Villeurbanne Cedex - France
|
|
Mohand-Said Hacid
|
University Claude Bernard Lyon, LIRIS CNRS, Villeurbanne Cedex - France
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14, Downloads (12 Months): 79, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The establishment of globalization is driving inter- organizational collaboration towards a necessity. We cannot expect total conformity between organizations nor homogeneous security settings. Nevertheless, each organization, with its own security policies, needs to exchange data. Employees involved in inter-organizational tasks shall require remote access to data hosted by other organizations. Administrating access control policies for those employees creates problems for security officers, particularly for role assignments. Flexibility in extending (or restricting) permissions for roles imported from other organizations is required. In this work, we present an approach based on Description Logic formalisms to create from the inter-organizational agreement a set of bridge rules that in addition to (i) the permissions assigned to a given role from one organization and (ii) the permissions assigned to another role in the other organization, allows security officers to check consistency of the resulting combination of roles from both organizations.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Franz Baader , Diego Calvanese , Deborah L. McGuinness , Daniele Nardi , Peter F. Patel-Schneider, The description logic handbook: theory, implementation, and applications, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 2003
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
A. Borgida and L. Serafini. Distributed description logics: Assimilating information from peer sources. Journal of Data Semantics, (1):153--184, 2003.
|
| |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
D. Ferraiolo and D. Kuhn. Role based access control. In Proceedings of the 15th National Computer Security Conference, 1992.
|
 |
11
|
T. Finin , A. Joshi , L. Kagal , J. Niu , R. Sandhu , W. Winsborough , B. Thuraisingham, ROWLBAC: representing role based access control in OWL, Proceedings of the 13th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, June 11-13, 2008, Estes Park, CO, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1377836.1377849]
|
| |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
| |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
S. R. Smriti Sinha, Mousum Handique. Networks, data mining and artificial intelligence trends and future directions. Proc. Of the National Workshop on Trends in Advanced Computing, Narosa Publishers:pp 193--201, 2006.
|
 |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
C. Zhao, N. Heilili, S. Liu, and Z. Lin. Representation and reasoning on rbac: A description logic approach. In In ICTAC, pages 381--393, 2005.
|
|