ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A multimedia interface for facilitating comparisons of opinions
Full text PdfPdf (562 KB)
Source
International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Visualization & designer tools table of contents
Pages 325-334  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-168-2
Authors
Giuseppe Carenini  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Lucas Rizoli  University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 177,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1502650.1502696
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Written opinion on products and other entities can be important to consumers and researchers, but expensive and difficult to analyze. We present a multimedia interface designed to facilitate the analysis of opinions on multiple entities, which could be beneficial to many individuals and organizations. It integrates an information visualization and an intelligent system that selects notable comparisons in the data and summarizes them in text. This system applies a set of statistics for comparing opinions across entities. We conducted a study of our interface with 36 subjects. Subjects liked the visualization overall and our system's selections overlapped with those of subjects more than did the selections of baseline systems. Given the choice, subjects often changed their selections to be more consistent with those of our system. This suggests that system selections were valuable to them.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
D. Brodbeck and L. Girardin. Visualization of large-scale customer satisfaction surveys using a parallel-coordinate tree. In INFOVIS '03: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pages 197--201. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
 
5
G. Carenini and J. C. K. Cheung. Extractive vs. NLG-based abstractive summarization of evaluative text: The effect of corpus controversiality. In INLG '08: Proceedings of the 57th International Natural Language Generation Conference. ACL, 2008.
 
6
G. Carenini, R. Ng, and A. Pauls. Multi-document summarization of evaluative text. In EACL '06: Proceedings of the 11th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL, 2006.
7
8
 
9
J. Chevalier and D. Mayzlin. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Working Paper, 2003.
 
10
C. Dellarocas, N. Awad, and X. Zhang. Exploring the value of online reviews to organizations: Implications for revenue forecasting and planning. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Information Systems, 2004.
 
11
A. Fujii and T. Ishikawa. A system for summarizing and visualizing arguments in subjective documents: Toward supporting decision making. In COLING-ACL '06: Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment and Subjectivity in Text, pages 15--22. ACL, 2006.
 
12
A. Ghose. The Economic Impact of User-Generated and Firm-Published Online Content: Directions for Advancing the Frontiers in Electronic Commerce Research. Wiley & Sons, 2007. Online chapter.
 
13
14
 
15
M. Hu and B. Liu. Feature based summary of customer reviews dataset. http://www.cs.uic.edu/Üliub/FBS/sentiment-analysis.html, 2004.
16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Giuseppe Carenini: colleagues
Lucas Rizoli: colleagues