ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Learning to generalize for complex selection tasks
Full text PdfPdf (763 KB)
Source
International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Demonstration based interfaces table of contents
Pages 167-176  
Year of Publication: 2009
ISBN:978-1-60558-168-2
Authors
Alan Ritter  University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Sumit Basu  Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 118,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1502650.1502676
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Selection tasks are common in modern computer interfaces: we are often required to select a set of files, emails, data entries, and the like. File and data browsers have sorting and block selection facilities to make these tasks easier, but for complex selections there is little to aid the user without writing complex search queries. We propose an interactive machine learning solution to this problem called "smart selection," in which the user selects and deselects items as inputs to a selection classifier which attempts at each step to correctly generalize to the user's target state. Furthermore, we take advantage of our data on how users perform selection tasks over many sessions, and use it to train a label regressor that models their generalization behavior: we call this process learning to generalize. We then combine the user's explicit labels as well the label regressor outputs in the selection classifier to predict the user's desired selections. We show that the selection classifier alone takes dramatically fewer mouse clicks than the standard file browser, and when used in conjunction with the label regressor, the predictions of the classifier are significantly more accurate with respect to the target selection state.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Bishop, C. "Linear Models for Classification." In Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, 2006.
3
 
4
5
6
 
7
 
8
Kristjansson, T. Culotta, A. Viola, P. McCallum, A. "Interactive Information Extraction with Constrained Conditional Random Fields." In Proc. of AAAI 2004.
9
10
 
11
Mitchell, T.M. "Version Spaces: A Candidate Elimination Approach to Rule Learning." In Proc. of IJCAI 1977.
 
12
Platt, J.C. Burges, C.J.C. Swenson, S. Weare, C. Zheng, A. "Learning a Gaussian Process Prior for Automatically Generating Music Playlists." In Proc. of NIPS 2002.
 
13
Thrun, S. "Is Learning the n-th Thing Any Easier Than Learning the First?" In Proc. of NIPS 1996.