|
ABSTRACT
We all encounter many documents on a daily basis that we do not have time to process in their entirety. Nevertheless, we lack good tools to rapidly skim and identify key information from within such documents. This paper develops and evaluates Interactive Compression (IC) techniques that allow users to dynamically configure the amount of information they view in a document, e.g. by automatically removing unimportant information from view (Excision) or by making important information more salient (Highlighting). We explore IC techniques in the context of meeting transcripts that are typically unstructured - making it difficult to isolate relevant regions and extract key information. We demonstrate the superiority of IC compared with an unmodified text control. In contrast to traditional summaries, our results show extensive use of interactive, as opposed to fixed compression level, summarization. They also show the value of word- as opposed to utterance-based compression. There are also trade-offs between different IC designs. Excision allows users to scan documents faster than Highlighting but at the expense of overlooking relevant sections of the document.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
AMI. http://www.amiproject.org. 2008.
|
 |
2
|
Lyn Bartram , Albert Ho , John Dill , Frank Henigman, The continuous zoom: a constrained fisheye technique for viewing and navigating large information spaces, Proceedings of the 8th annual ACM symposium on User interface and software technology, p.207-215, November 15-17, 1995, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
[doi> 10.1145/215585.215977]
|
 |
3
|
Sumit Basu , Surabhi Gupta , Milind Mahajan , Patrick Nguyen , John C. Platt, Scalable summaries of spoken conversations, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, January 13-16, 2008, Gran Canaria, Spain
[doi> 10.1145/1378773.1378809]
|
 |
4
|
Patrick Baudisch , Nathaniel Good , Victoria Bellotti , Pamela Schraedley, Keeping things in context: a comparative evaluation of focus plus context screens, overviews, and zooming, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
[doi> 10.1145/503376.503423]
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
CALO. http://caloproject.sri.com. 2008.
|
| |
7
|
E. Chi et al. Visual foraging of highlighted text: An eye-tracking study. In Proceedings of CHI, 2006.
|
| |
8
|
CHIL. http://chil.server.de/servlet/is/101. 2008.
|
 |
9
|
Douglass R. Cutting , David R. Karger , Jan O. Pedersen , John W. Tukey, Scatter/Gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections, Proceedings of the 15th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.318-329, June 21-24, 1992, Copenhagen, Denmark
[doi> 10.1145/133160.133214]
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
T. Hayama et al. Personalized environments for skimming documents. In V. Palade, R. Howlett, and L. Jain, editors, Lecture Notes In Computer Science, volume 2774, pages pp. 771--778. Springer-Verlag, 2003.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
M. Hearst. User interfaces and visualization. In R. Baeza-Yates and B. RIbeiro-Neto, editors, Modern Information Retrieval. Addison-Wesley, 1999.
|
 |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
K. S. Jones. A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retreival. Journal of Documentation, 28:11--21, 1972.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
D. Lalanne et al. The IM2 multimodal meeting browser family. Technical report, IM2 Project, 2005.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
I. Mani. Automatic Summarization. John Benjamins, 2001.
|
| |
20
|
I. McCowan et al. The AMI meeting corpus. In Proceedings of the Measuring Behavior 2005 symposium on Annotating and Measuring Meeting Behavior, 2005.
|
| |
21
|
G. Murray and S. Renals. Dialogue act compression via pitch contour preservation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Pittsburgh, USA, Sept. 2006.
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
P. Pirolli and S. Card. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4):643--675, 1999.
|
| |
24
|
R. Rienks and D. Heylen. Automatic dominance detection in meetings using easily obtainable features. In H. Bourlard and S. Renals, editors, Lecture Notes In Computer Science. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2006.
|
| |
25
|
|
 |
26
|
|
 |
27
|
|
 |
28
|
Steve Whittaker , Julia Hirschberg , Brian Amento , Litza Stark , Michiel Bacchiani , Philip Isenhour , Larry Stead , Gary Zamchick , Aaron Rosenberg, SCANMail: a voicemail interface that makes speech browsable, readable and searchable, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
[doi> 10.1145/503376.503426]
|
 |
29
|
Steve Whittaker , Julia Hirschberg , John Choi , Don Hindle , Fernando Pereira , Amit Singhal, SCAN: designing and evaluating user interfaces to support retrieval from speech archives, Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.26-33, August 15-19, 1999, Berkeley, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/312624.312639]
|
| |
30
|
|
 |
31
|
|
|