ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An affective model of user experience for interactive art
Full text PdfPdf (1.70 MB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 352 archive
Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology table of contents
Yokohama, Japan
SESSION: Technical track: Affective computing table of contents
Pages 107-110  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-393-8
Authors
Stephen W. Gilroy  University of Teesside, Middlesbrough, UK
Marc Cavazza  University of Teesside, Middlesbrough, UK
Rémi Chaignon  University of Teesside, Middlesbrough, UK
Satu-Marja Mäkelä  VTT Electronics, Finland
Markus Niranen  VTT Electronics, Finland
Elisabeth André  University of Augsburg, Germany
Thurid Vogt  University of Augsburg, Germany
Jérôme Urbain  Faculté Polytechnique de Mons, Belgium
Hartmut Seichter  HITLabNZ, New Zealand
Mark Billinghurst  HITLabNZ, New Zealand
Maurice Benayoun  Citu, Université Paris, Panthéon-Sorbonne
Sponsors
IPSJ : Information Processing Society of Japan
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 131,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1501750.1501774
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The development of Affective Interface technologies makes it possible to envision a new generation of Digital Arts and Entertainment applications, in which interaction will be based directly on the analysis of user experience. In this paper, we describe an approach to the development of Multimodal Affective Interfaces that supports real-time analysis of user experience as part of an Augmented Reality Art installation. The system relies on a PAD dimensional model of emotion to support the fusion of affective modalities, each input modality being represented as a PAD vector. A further advantage of the PAD model is that it can support a representation of affective responses that relate to aesthetic impressions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Sharma, R. Pavlovic, V. I. Huang, T. S. 1998. Toward multimodal human-computer interface. Proceedings of the IEEE. Vol. 86(5), pp. 853--869.
 
2
Mehrabian, A. 1995. Framework for a comprehensive description and measurement of emotional states. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 121, 339--361.
 
3
Russell, J. A. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 39, 1161--1178
 
4
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of Positive and Negative Affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of personality and social psychology, 54, 1063--1070
 
5
Barrett, L. F. 1998. Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of personality and social psychology, 74, 967--984
 
6
Mehrabian, A. 1996. Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 14, 261--292
 
7
Porat, T., Liss, R., Tractinsky, N., 2007. E-Stores Design: Influence of E-Store Design and Product type on consumers' emotions and attitudes. 12th International Conference, HCI International 2007, Beijing, China, July 22--27, 2007, Proceedings, Part IV, LNCS 4553, pp. 712--721. Springer-Verlag.
 
8
Helfenstein, S. 2005. Product Meaning, Affective use and Transfer. Human Technology, 1. pp. 76--100, April 2005.
 
9
Becker, C., Kopp, S., Wachsmuth, I., 2004. Simulating the Emotion Dynamics of a Multimodal Conversational Agent. Affective Dialogue Systems. Tutorial and Research Workshop, ADS 2004, Kloster Irsee, Germany, June 14--16, 2004. Proceedings. LNCS 3068, pp. 154--165. Springer-Verlag.
 
10
Becker, C. Wachsmuth, I. 2006. Modeling Primary and Secondary Emotions for a Believable Communication Agent. International Workshop on Emotion and Computing, in conj. with the 29th annual German Conference on Artificial Intelligenz (KI2006), Bremen, Germany, pp 31--34, 2006.
 
11
J. Looser, R. Grasset, H. Seichter, M. Billinghurst. 2006. OSGART-A Pragmatic Approach to MR. In Industrial Workshop at ISMAR 2006, Santa Barbara, California, USA, October, 2006.
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
Fiala, M., 2007. Magic Mirror System with Hand-held and Wearable Augmentations, IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, 10--14 March 2007, pp. 251--254.
 
16
 
17
J. A. Russell. 1989. Measures of Emotion. In Emotion: Theory, Research and Experience, ch. 4, pp. 83--111. Academic Press, Inc.
 
18
Popper, F. 2007. From Technological to Virtual Art. Cambridge (Mass.), MIT Press.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stephen W. Gilroy: colleagues
Marc Cavazza: colleagues
Rémi Chaignon: colleagues
Satu-Marja Mäkelä: colleagues
Markus Niranen: colleagues
Elisabeth André: colleagues
Thurid Vogt: colleagues
Jérôme Urbain: colleagues
Hartmut Seichter: colleagues
Mark Billinghurst: colleagues
Maurice Benayoun: colleagues