Augmented reality and rigid body simulation for edutainment: the interesting mechanism - an AR puzzle to teach Newton physics

ABSTRACT

Physics simulation is becoming more common in computing. We have developed a comprehensive toolkit to connect the physical and virtual world within Augmented Reality (AR) using rigid body simulation. Unlike existing techniques of embedding physics simulations into 3D environments, the use of rigid body simulations within AR requires a different approach. To demonstrate our approach we developed an edutainment game based on the concept of chain reactions and physical contraptions.

In this paper we elaborate on the constraints introduced by mixing AR and rigid body simulation, and how it subsequently effects the visual richness and perceptual appearance of an AR simulation. We describe our implementation approach and provide an analysis of additional scenarios which would be enriched by physical simulation.

REFERENCES

• 1: Kusuma Agusanto , Li Li , Zhu Chuangui , Ng Wan Sing, Photorealistic rendering for augmented reality using environment illumination, Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, p.208, October 07-10, 2003
• 2: D. Baraff, Analytical methods for dynamic simulation of non-penetrating rigid bodies, ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, v.23 n.3, p.223-232, July 1989
• 3: Mark Billinghurst , Hirokazu Kato, Real world teleconferencing, CHI '99 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania [doi>10.1145/632716.632838]
• 4: Willi Bruns, Grasping, communicating, understanding: connecting reality and virtuality, AI & Society, v.10 n.1, p.6-14, 1996 [doi>10.1007/BF02716750]
• 5: George Drettakis , Luc Robert , Sylvain Bougnoux, Interactive Common Illumination for Computer Augmented Reality, Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques '97, p.45-56, June 16-18, 1997
• 6: Christian Geiger , Tim Schmidt , Jorg Stocklein, Rapid Development of Expressive AR Applications, Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, p.292-293, November 02-05, 2004 [doi>10.1109/ISMAR.2004.49]
• 7: S. Gilroy, M. Cavazza, R. Chaignon, S. Mäkelä, M. Niiranen, E. André, T. Vogt, M. Billinghurst, H. Seichter, and M. Benayoun. An emotionally responsive ar art installation. In ISMAR 2007, 2007.
• 8: J. Looser, R. Grasset, H. Seichter, and M. Billinghurst. Osgart - a pragmatic approach to mr. In ISMAR 2006, 2006.
• 9: Blair MacIntyre , Maribeth Gandy , Steven Dow , Jay David Bolter, DART: a toolkit for rapid design exploration of augmented reality experiences, Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October 24-27, 2004, Santa Fe, NM, USA [doi>10.1145/1029632.1029669]
• 10: Y. M. Masataka Imura, Yoshihiro Yasumuro. Fountain designer: Control virtual water as you like. In ISMAR 2006.
• 11: B. Shneiderman. The future of interactive systems and the emergence of direct manipulation. College Park, Md.: University of Maryland, 1982.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  J. Computer Applications
  J.5 ARTS AND HUMANITIES

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.0 GENERAL

Keywords:
Rube Goldberg machine, augmented reality, edutainment, physics simulation, tangible user interface