| Vertical and outboard migration: a progress report |
| Full text |
Pdf
(931 KB)
|
| Source
|
AFIPS Joint Computer Conferences
archive
Proceedings of the May 4-7, 1981, national computer conference
table of contents
Chicago, Illinois
SESSION: Computer hardware and architecture
table of contents
Pages 69-74
Year of Publication: 1981
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsor |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 9, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
The primary method for gaining performance improvement on a fixed-hardware architecture is to tailor the soft components, i.e. the application program, the operating system, or the firmware, to the performance requirements. This paper deals with two specific forms of performance tuning called vertical and outboard migration. These terms refer respectively to migrating (pieces of) functions from higher levels to lower levels in a software/firmware/hardware hierarchy and to migrating such functionality to auxiliary processors such as I/O processors which can run in parallel with the CPU to offload it. The performance gains in vertical migration result from the elimination of CPU overhead, while those in outboard migration result from the ability to offload the CPU and have separate (special-purpose) processors execute the migrated code asynchronously and in parallel with CPU execution.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
R. A. Heller, "Experiences and opportunities in vertical migration of computing functions", in Proceedings of a Conference on Information Processing, Kiel, March 1980.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Amdahl Corporation, Amdahl 5860 product announcement, November 1980.
|
| |
5
|
G. Chroust, A. Kreuzer and K. Stadler, "A microprogrammed page fault monitor", Kepler University, Linz, Informatik-Berichte: SYSPRO 1980.
|
| |
6
|
E. Feilmair and K. Stadler, "A CSECT monitor to measure program flow", Institute for Informatics, J. Kepler University, Linz, 1980.
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
 |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
|